Showing posts with label renato corona. Show all posts
Showing posts with label renato corona. Show all posts

Monday, January 16, 2012

Senate opens Renato Corona's impeachment trial

Manila, Philippines — The Senate formally began the impeachment trial against Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona on Monday (January 16).

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, who sits as presiding officer, banged the gavel past 2:00 p.m. to signal the start of the proceedings.

Senator Edgardo Angara opened the 2:11 p.m. proceedings with a prayer asking the heavens to grant him and his colleagues good judgment.

The impeachment complaint against Corona was initiated and signed by 188 members of the House of Representatives last Dec. 12, 2011 and filed in the Senate the following day.

On Dec. 14, 2011, the Senate convened itself as an impeachment court to try the case of Renato Corona.

The 11-man prosecution team was then immediately formed by the House. Iloilo Representative Niel Tupas Jr. will be the lead prosecutor while Cavite Representative Joseph Emilio Abaya will manage the prosecution team.

The other members of the Prosecution team are Ilocos Norte Rep. Rodolfo C. Fariñas, Akbayan Rep. Arlene J. Bag-ao, CIBAC Rep. Sherwin N. Tugna, Cavite Rep. Elpidio F. Barzaga Jr., Oriental Mindoro Rep. Reynaldo V. Umali, Northern Samar Rep. Raul Daza, Pangasinan Rep. Marlyn L. Primicias-Agabas, Bayan Muna Rep. Neri J. Colmenares and Isabela Rep. Giorgidi B. Aggabao.

Corona's defense team on the other hand is composed of former Supreme Court Justice Serafin Cuevas, Ramon Esguerra, Jacinto Jimenez and Tranquil Salvador of Romulo Mabanta Buenaventura Sayoc and De Los Angeles law offices, German Lichauco III, Dennis Manalo and Noel Lazaro of Siguion Reyna Montecillo and Ongsiako law offices, Jose Roy III, former dean of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila [University of Manila]'s Law School, Joel Bodegon, managing partner of Bodegon Estorninos Guerzon Borje & Gozos law offices, Rico Paolo Quicho, partner in Quicho and Angeles law offices, and Karen Jimeno, a cum laude graduate from the UP College of Law.


Source Inquirer

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Satisfaction for Corona drops to negative according to SWS

Renato Corona
Philippines - It seems it does not bode well for the judiciary branch of the government, having been double teamed by the Executive and the Legislative branches and now, they are losing the support of the people as well.

Public satisfaction for the impeached Chief Justice Renato Corona has dropped further and is now in the negative territory, a new Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey revealed on Friday.

The survey was conducted last December 3-7, 2011, and shows that net satisfaction for Corona has dipped from 0 in the past 2 quarterly surveys to -14 in the past month.

The latest net satisfaction for Corona is only 4 percentage points higher than his previous all-time low of -18 in the June 2010 survey of SWS.

Corona has received the lowest net satisfaction rating among chief justices since the SWS started doing surveys on government officials' ratings in October 1986. He has yet to receive positive net satisfaction ratings since being appointed the country's top magistrate in 2010.

Corona is facing possible ouster after being impeached by the House of Representatives. His impeachment trial before the Senate will start on January 16.


The SWS survey, meanwhile, showed a 7-percentage-point increase for Vice-President Jejomar Binay's net satisfaction rating, from +63 in September 2011 to +70 in December 2011.

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile's net satisfaction rating rose slightly from +35 to +36 while Speaker Sonny Belmonte's rating dipped slightly from +9 to +8 during the period.

Meanwhile, public satisfaction for the country's top government institutions also suffered in the last quarter of 2011. Public satisfaction for the Senate dropped from +55 to +44, the House of Representatives' rating dropped from +31 to +27, while the Cabinet's rating dropped from +24 to +22.

Public satisfaction for the Supreme Court also dropped from +29 to +21.

With the current government tearing each other apart, we can expect a further drop in the government ratings, unless there are some changes to take place.

Monday, January 9, 2012

Philippine Chief Justice can't afford condos but has it?

Philippines - Malacañang on Saturday stepped up the pressure on the alleged corrupt, former-President Arroyo puppet, Chief Justice Renato Corona to disclose his statements of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN), claiming that Corona's salary as a government official would not have been enough for him to pay for the purchase of a luxury condominium unit worth more than P14 million (US$317,000).

By Budget Secretary Florencio Abad's reckoning, if an official does not earn enough to buy a multimillion-peso property (plus a few others, as alleged by the House prosecution panel in Corona's impeachment trial) then the properties may have been acquired through other means.

"If it's true that he owns not just the Bellagio penthouse but possibly other real properties in pricy locations and knowing that the income alone from government service will not afford the Chief Justice the ability to acquire those assets, a reasonable mind can only conclude that the Chief Justice may have other sources of income outside of government or that those properties may have been acquired some other way," Abad said in a text message.

"That it why it becomes even more compelling for the Chief Justice to publicly disclose his SALN. Otherwise, inquiring minds will begin to speculate," he said.

Deputy presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte said a government official's salary would really not be enough to buy a premium piece of property unless he has received a sizeable inheritance or has returns on investments made before entering government.

The Palace officials made the remarks after the publication of Corona's SALNs from the years that he served in Malacañang, which placed his net worth at almost P15 million in 1992 and at P14 million in 2002. The news media Inquirer obtained the data from a source privy to the House prosecution panel's evidence in Corona's impeachment trial.

Abad said he has yet to see Corona's SALNs for 1992 and 2002 while Valte said the declaration should be in the records of the Office of the President. She said she would look into the records to see if the Palace had the same figures.

Aquino administration officials and anti-Corona partisans have been harping on Corona's failure to make public his SALN since joining the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court spokesperson Midas Marquez has explained that high court justices have not published their SALNs since a 1992 resolution of the Narvasa court restricting the release of the SALNs of justices and judges to shield them from acts which may "endanger, diminish or destroy their independence and objectivity in the performance of their judicial functions."

Court order needed

Justices of the Supreme Court are obliged to submit documents concerning their assets and liabilities to the clerk of court every year. Since the 1992 resolution, parties requesting a copy of a judge's or a justice's SALN have to secure a court order.

Since the outcry for Corona to disclose his SALN, two Supreme Court justices have released details of their SALNs. Associate Justices Antonio Carpio and Maria Lourdes Sereno furnished the Kaya Natin [eng: We can do it], one of the groups demanding that Corona produce his SALNs to show proof that he can afford to buy a pricy condominium, summaries of their SALNs.

House prosecutors are timing to present Corona's alleged ownership of expensive real estate as evidence of corruption in his impeachment trial to start a week from now in the Senate.

According to Valte, it would not be possible to afford a P14-million luxury condominium unit - let alone a few other pieces of premium property - while living on a government salary for roughly 20 years.

"Not unless it could be shown there was an inheritance while in service," Valte told state-run radio dzRB.

Valte also said having the means to buy a property like Corona's alleged 300-square meter unit at the Bellagio development in Bonifacio Global City would depend on the pieces of property that he already owned upon entering government service.

"If only on a government salary, it really wouldn't be enough," she said.

Meanwhile, Marquez did not answer calls and text messages to his phone, asking for comment on the latest sally from Malacañang.

Ernesto Francisco Jr., one of Corona's lawyers, also declined to comment as he was withdrawing from the Chief Justice's legal team.

He declined to reveal the reasons for his departure, saying only that he would formalize it on Tuesday.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Philippine Chief Justice Renato Corona strikes back at Malacañang!

Philippine Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona
Today, Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona made a statement against the Malacañang, and accused Aquino of forcing his impeachment so that he can appoint his own chief magistrate and control the high court. He spole at the Supreme Court grounds in Padre Faura, Manila in front of supporters from various courts on Wednesday on what appears to be a protest against Corona's impeachment.

Here's the message he delivered this afternoon:

Tagalog version: (For English Version click here)

"Ako ang Unang Tagapagtanggol ng Hustisya!

Isang mainit at mapagpalayang hapon po sa ating lahat!

Tunay na hustisya, kadakilaan ng Kataas-taasang Hukuman, at kalayaan ng hudikatura, tatlo pong prinsipyo na nagbibigay sa akin - sa ating lahat - ng lakas at tapang na harapin ang hamon at pagsubok na bunga ng masamang pulitika.

HINDI PO TAYO PAPAYAG NA LAPASTANGANIN AT ALIPUSTAHIN ANG DEMOKRASYA, AT ANG KORTE SUPREMA!

Sa isang iglap, nasampahan po ako ng isang impeachment complaint ng mababang kapulungan na kontrolado ng Liberal Party ni Ginoong Aquino at ng kanyang mga kaalyado. Sa sobrang bilis, parang wala po yatang naka-intindi o nakabasa man lang ng halos animnapung pahinang reklamo o habla. Isang daan, walumpu't walong kinatawan ang basta na lamang lumagda rito para isulong ang aking impeachment. Kinikilala natin ang proseso ng Saligang Batas para sa mga reklamo laban sa mga miyembro ng Korte Suprema. Ngunit ang hindi natin kinikilala ay ang pag-abuso ng kapangyarihan at proseso para samantalahin ang lahat ng paraan, makapagtalaga lamang sila ng sarili nilang mga mahistrado sa Korte Suprema.

Itong impeachment ay dala ng kasakiman na magkaroon ng isang Korte Suprema na kayang diktahan, na nakukuha sa tingin, at magkakandarapang ipatupad ang kanilang bawat hiling.

Tila yata'y napipikon at hindi sila makapagtalaga ng kanilang punong mahistrado kung susundin ang ating umiiral na Saligang Batas. Kaya pati ang inyong lingkod, hadlang daw sa kaunlaran ng bayan at pagpapatupad ng mga ipinangako sa kampanya!

Pasadahan po natin ang mga walang katuturang paratang ng ating mga magigiting na mambabatas. Walo po ang hinain na paratang laban sa akin. Kaagad, makikitang dalawang uri ang bintang na nilalaman nito: sa isang banda, 'yung mga reklamong tumutukoy sa mga personal kong kilos, at sa kabilang banda naman, ang mga reklamo na tumutukoy sa mga opisyal na pagkilos o hatol ng Korte Suprema.

Mariin kong itinatanggi ang mga bintang na may katiwalian sa mga pansarili kong kilos. Hindi po totoo ang sinasabing ayaw ko raw ilabas ang aking Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth. Ito'y isang dokumentong sinusumite ko taun-taon ng walang patid. Malaking kasinungalingan ang paratang na ito.

Ako raw po ay isang midnight appointee. Dapat raw po, hindi ko tinanggap ang paghirang sa akin. Bakit po ba, para si Ginoong Aquino ang makapagtalaga ng kaniyang sariling chief justice na hawak niya sa leeg?

Mapapa-iling ka talaga. Ang pagtatalaga sa inyong lingkod ay dumaan sa isang masusing proseso na ayon sa ating Saligang Batas. Kasama po dito ang proseso ng Judicial and Bar Council na noon ay pinangungunahan ng dating Punong Mahistrado Reynato Puno. Matagal na po itong pinagpasyahan ng Korte Suprema. Matagal nang tapos ito. Kung may reklamo man sila sa hatol ng Korte Suprema, sana ay noon pa, ipinaglaban na nila.

Binibuhay ito para painitin ang damdamin ng ating mga kababayan at mawalaan tayo ng tiwala sa Korte Suprema at hudikatura. Di po ba't may kasabihan na 'ang isang kasinungalingan, kapag inulit ng inulit, pagtagal, ay siyang tinatanggap bilang katotohanan?' Paano po naman maging kasalanan ang pagtanggap ng isang dakilang karangalan tulad nito? Ito ay isa lamang pong paninira ng aking katapatan sa katungkulan, kasama na po ang puri at dangal ng Kataas taasang Hukuman.

Ngunit ang kasukdulan ng pambabastos, sa aking pananaw, ay ang pagdawit ng aking may-bahay sa reklamong ito. Baka akala nila na sa ganitong paraan ako po'y madaling susuko. Mapalad po ako na mayroon akong isang mabait at matatag na kasama sa buhay, na siya ring pinagkukunan ko ng lakas at inspirasyon. Mahal na mahal kita, Tina.

Walang katotohan ang kanilang mga paratang - puro kasinungalingan. At patutunayan namin na ito ay isang pag-blackmail lamang. Lingid po yata sa kanilang kaalaman na si Ginang Corona ay una pang naitalaga bago ako naging mahistrado. Bakit, hindi po ba dito sa kasalukuyang administrasyon mayroong isang mag-asawa, kasama ang kanilang mga anak, na may matataas na puwesto?

Ang mga natitirang paratang ay ukol naman sa mga pasiya at iba pang matagal nang patakaran ng Korte Suprema. Alalahanin po natin na ayon sa ating Saligang Batas, ang Korte Suprema Ay binubuo ng isang punong mahistrado at labing-apat na katulong na mahistrado. Mayroon po lamang kaming tig-iisang boto, at ito po ay pantay-pantay. Ang aking boto ay kapareho lamang ng boto ng pinakahuling naitalagang mahistrado. Ang pwersa at bisa ng aking pananaw ay kapantay lamang ng pwersa at bisa ng pananaw ng kahit sino mang mahistrado. Pantay-pantay po kaming lahat dito.

At sa mga isyu na sinasabi nilang kaugnay sa dating pangulo, wala po kaming kinakatigan dito sa hukumang ito. Ang aming pasiya ay pasiya ng buong Korte Suprema at resulta ng mga indibidwal na opinyon. Ang opinyon ng isang mahistrado ay hindi desisyon ng Korte Suprema. Kahit sinumang abogado ay magsasabi sa inyo na hindi po pwedeng yapak-yapakan ang karapatan ng sinuman sa ilalim ng Saligang Batas, habang hindi mo pa napapatunayan na siya ay nagkasala. May mandato ang korte na ipagtanggol higit sa lahat ang karapatang pang-tao ng indibidwal kontra sa labis-labis na kapangyarihan ng pamahalaan, lalong-lao pa kung wala pang naisasampang kaso. Matagal na itong prinsipyo at hindi na kailangang idebate. Ito ang tinatawag na PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE and RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS.

Isampa ang tamang kaso sa loob ng wastong oras, na may tamang ebidensya para walang magawa ang korte kung di hatulan at ipakulong ang nagkasala sa lipunan. Panagutin natin ang dapat managot, pero idaan natin sa wasto at tamang proseso sa ilalim ng Saligang Batas. Ano po ba ang napakahirap intindihin sa bagay na ito? Ibang-iba po ang palakad sa gabinete, sapagkat doon, lahat ng miyembro ay mga alalay, alagad at utusan ng pangulo. Sa loob ng gabinete, ang utos ng hari, hindi nababali. Dito po sa Korte Suprema, ang pananaw ng punong mahistrado ay isa lamang.. Gaya nga ng sinabi ko, kami ay patas at pare-pareho lamang na nagbibigay halaga at respeto sa opinyon ng bawat isa. Wala po kaming tungkulin at balak na maging sunod-sunuran sa isa't-isa.

Ngayon, ipagpalagay na natin na malimit kasama ko ang mayorya sa botohan, maari ba namang magmistulang pagkampi ito, samantalang nakararami kaming sumasang-ayon sa isang pananaw? Kasalanan po ba na ako'y kasapi ng mayorya ng Korte sa iilang mga kaso? Marami din naman pong kaso na nasa menorya ako sapagka't natalo sa botohan ang aming pananaw. Ito ang magpapatunay na walang nagdidikta ng boto dito sa Korte Suprema.

Kaya nga po dito natin makikita ang likas na talino at sadyang makatarungan na sistema ng hustisya sa ating Saligang-Batas: labing-lima po kami sa Korte Suprema, upang masiguro na mangibabaw ang pananaw ng mas nakakarami. Hindi maaring magtagumpay ang pananaw ng nag-iisang mahistrado.

Samakatuwid, itong mga paratang ng pagkiling laban sa akin ay bunga lamang ng malisya at kathang-isip. Malamang, umaasa ang mga kalaban ng Korte, na ako at ang ibang miyembro na di nila kayang diktahan, ay mag-bibitiw sa tungkulin.

At kung sakaling magtagumpay ang impeachment na ito laban sa akin, ano sa palagay ninyo ang mangyayari? Simple lang po mga mahal kong mga kababayan - kay Ginoong Aquino na ang gabinete, kontrolado na niya ang kongreso, at hawak na niya ang Korte Suprema. Paulit-ulit nalang nilang isinisigaw ang checks and balances ng three co-equal branches of government, ngunit ang kanilang mga pagkilos ay patungo sa pagsakop sa buong sistema at kapangyarihan ng pamahalaan. Itong mga itinatanim niyang gawain ay siguradong mamumunga lamang ng isang diktadura; isang diktadura na nagmula sa paglilinlang at paglalason sa pag-iisip ng ating mga kababayan.

At ngayon, sasabihin ko po sa kanilang lahat: ako'y tumututol sa walang-tigil na pang-aalipusta, pangduduro at pananakot. Ako'y tumututol sa dahan-dahang binubuong diktadura ni Pangulong Benigno Simeon Aquino III. Kahapon lamang, iginigiit ng palasyo na hindi raw ang Korte Suprema o hudikatura, at ako lang daw, ang tinitira dito sa impeachment. Ito po'y malaking kasinungalingan, dahil hindi ako naniniwala na si Renato Corona lang ang tumututol sa diktadura. Walang katotohanan na si Renato Corona lamang ang gusto nilang tanggalin sa Korte Suprema. Naniniwala po ako na tayong lahat ang kinakalaban, pati na ang mga walang-malay nilang tagahanga. Sapagkat ang tunay na layunin ay wasakin ang hudikatura, wasakin ang ating demokrasya, at pairalin ang utos ng mahal na hari. Ito ang patutunguhan ng baluktot na 'Daang Matuwid.'

Matagal na po akong nagtitimpi. Hindi ko po maintindihan kung bakit nanggigigil ng husto sa akin ang mahal nating pangulo, magmula pa po sa kanyang pagkaluklok sa pwesto.

Tuwing kami'y nagkikita, lubos kong pinararamdam na kami'y dapat mag-ugnayan, magsama at magtulungan para sa bayan. Marami po tayong problema. Nandiyan po ang mabagal na takbo ng ekonomiya, kawalan ng trabaho, kahirapan at kagutuman. Mukhang hindi po niya naintindihan.

Kumakailan lamang, tinuya na naman po tayo ng harap-harapan. Tulad ng tunay na Kristianong Batangueño, tayo po ay nagpigil, at ito po ay ating pinalampas.

Wala po akong kasalanan sa inyo, Ginoong Pangulo. Wala po akong kasalanan sa taong-bayan.

Sabi nila, sarili ko lang daw po ang nakataya dito. Ang pinaglalaban po natin dito ay ang kalayaan ng Korte Suprema, kalayaan ng hudikatura, at ang pagtanggol ng demokrasya sa ilalim ng Saligang Batas. Hindi po ako papayag na sumuko sa matinding pagtatangka na mapasailalim ng ibang sangay ng pamahalaan ang Korte Suprema. Una akong tututol. Una akong lalaban.

Ginoong Pangulo, ako po ang primus inter pares dito sa Korte Suprema. Ang ibig sabihin po nito, kung kailangan ipaglaban ang Korte Suprema, ako ang uuna.

Huwag na po nating isubo ang Korte Suprema sa ano pang pagsubok o batikos ng mga mapagsamantala. Yaman din lang na ang ipinaglalaban dito ay ang Korte Suprema at ang demokrasya, karangalan at katungkulan ko po na labanan itong impeachment para sa ating lahat. Haharapin ko nang buong tapang at talino ang mga walang basehang paratang na ito, punto por punto, sa Senado. Handang-handa akong humarap sa paglilitis.

Mga kasama, matapat kong sinasabi sa inyo, mahimbing ang tulog ko at tahimik ang aking konsyensya dahil sa pagpapatupad ng lahat ng aking mga tungkulin. Ako'y nanatiling matapat sa Panginoon, sa aking sarili, sa batas, at sa sinumang tao.

Para sa mga ngayon pa lang nakakarinig ng aking panawagan, inaanyayahan ko kayong makiisa sa amin. Ngayon pa lamang ay taos-puso na ang aking pasasalamat sa inyo sa inyong pagtaguyod, pakikiisa at pagpapalakas ng aming loob.

Mga minamahal kong kababayan, sa aking pagharap sa isang mapanganib na katunggali, ang aking tanging sandigan ay ang inyong pakiki-akibat, at ang paninindigan para sa Lumikha at sa ating bayan. Buong pagkukumbaba kong hinihiling ang inyong pang-unawa, subalit higit sa lahat, hinihiling kong samahan ninyo ako sa aking laban at misyon.

Muli, isang maganda at maalab na hapon po sa inyong lahat. Sana'y pagpalain po tayong lahat ng Maykapal."

For those who cannot understand Tagalog, here's the English Version.

"I am the first guardian of Justice!

A hot and liberating afternoon to all of us!

True Justice, greatness of the Supreme Court, and freedom of the judiciary, the three principles that gives me - and all of us - strength and courage to face the challenge and tests brought about by bad politics.

WE WILL NOT ALLOW DISRESPECT AND INSULT TOWARDS DEMOCRACY, AND THE SUPREME COURT!

In an instance, I was sued with an impeachment complaint by the lower assembly that's controlled by the Liberal Party of Mr. Aquino and his allies. At such excessive speeds, it's as if no one understood or even read the almost 60 pages of complaint or lawsuit. 180 representatives just signed this to advance my impeachment.

We recognize the constitutional process for complaints against members of the Supreme Court. But, we dot not recognize the abuse of power and the procedure to take advantage all the way, just so they could assign them their own justices to the Supreme Court.

This impeachment was brought by greed so to have a Supreme Court they can dictate, that can obtain with a mere look, and hastily implement their every request.

Apparently, they get mad for not being able to appoint their own chief justice if they follow our existing constitution. That's why they charge even your own servant, saying we are the barrier that prevents the progress of the nation, and the accomplishment of their promises in the campaign!

Let's go through the irrelevant allegations of our heroic legislators. They laid 8 allegations against me. Immediately, we can see two types of allegations contained herein: on one hand, those complaints that refer to my personal actions, and on the other hand, the complaint that refers to the official act or decision of the Supreme Court.

I calmly deny the allegations that there was corruption in my personal actions. It's not true that I don't want to release my Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth. This is a document that I uninterruptedly submit annually. This accusation is a big lie.

They say, I am a midnight appointee. They say, I should not have accepted this position. Why not, so that Mr. Aquino could assign his own chief justice he could dominate?

It can really make you shook your head. The appointment of your servant undergo a rigorous process that is in accordance with our Constitution.

Along with this is the process of the Judicial and Bar Council that was once led by former Chief Justice Reynato Puno. It has long been decided by the Supreme Court. It was done a long time ago. If they have a complaint with the ruling of the Supreme Court, they should have fought for it before.

They are reviving this issue to insinuate hate among our countrymen and we are losing our trust on the Supreme Court and the Judiciary. Isn't it there is a saying that says 'a lie, if kept on repeated, later, it is the one eventually accepted as the truth?' How can accepting this great honor be a mistake? This is just a ploy to damage my credibility, including the pride and dignity of the most high Court.

But the peak of scurrility, in my view, is the inclusion of my house wife in the complaint. Maybe they thought this way they could easily make me surrender. I'm lucky to have a good and strong partner, who is also the source of my strength and inspiration. I love you very much, Tina.

There's no truth in their allegations - nothing but lies. And we're going to prove that this is nothing more than a blackmail. Unbeknownst to them, Mrs. Corona had been appointed even before I became a magistrate. Why, in this current administration there's a couple, with their children, with a high position?

The remaining allegations were about my decisions and some other long-standing policy of the Supreme Court. We must remember that according to our Constitution, the Supreme Court is composed of a chief magistrate and 14 assistant magistrates. We only have one vote each, and this is equal. My vote is the same as with the latest assigned magistrate. The power and the effect of my decision is just equal to the power and effectiveness of any magistrate. We are all even here.

And for the issues they say we're related to the former president, we are not siding on anyone here in this court. Our decision is the decision of the entire Supreme Court and the results of individual opinions. The opinion of a magistrate is the decision of the Supreme Court. Even any lawyer will tell you that you cannot step on anybody's rights under the Constitution, while not yet verified that he/she was guilty.

The court has a mandate to defend, most importantly, the human rights of individuals against excessive government power, especially if there was no filed case. It has long been the principle and does not need to be debated. This is called PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE and RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS.

File the right case in an appropriate time, with conclusive evidence so the Supreme Court cannot do anything but to pass judgement and to jail those who wronged the society. We'll make those are accounted answer, but let's do this in the right process under the Constitution. What's so hard to understand in this matter? This is so different from running the cabinet, because there, all members are assistants, disciple and servants of the president. Inside the cabinet, the order of the king, can't be opposed. Here in the Supreme Court, the decision of the chief magistrate is one.. Like I said, we are all evenly giving value and respect on each other's opinion. We have no duty or intention to follow one another.

Now, supposing I often go with the majority in the voting, can this look like allegiance, when we mostly agree on one decision? Is it my fault that I belong to the majority of the Court in some cases?

There were also many cases where I was in the minority even my decision was lost in the voting. This is proof that no one is dictating on the votes here in the Supreme Court.

That is why here we can see the natural ingenuity and intended fair justice system in our Constitution: there are 15 of us in the Supreme Court, so to ensure that the decision of the majority stands out. It is not possible for the decision of one magistrate to succeed.

Therefore, these bias allegations against me is simply the result of malice and wishful thinking. Probably, the enemies of the Court are hoping, that I and the other members which they can not dictate, would let go of the office.

And if ever the impeachment would succeed against me, what do you think would happen? It's simple my beloved countrymen - Mr. Aquino will own the cabinet, he could control the congress, and he will hold the Supreme Court. They repeatedly shouted about checks and balances of the three co-equal branches of government, but their movement is towards conquest of the whole system and power of the government. These activities they sow are only sure to bring forth dictatorship; a dictatorship that came from deception and from poisoning the minds of our countrymen.

And now, I am going to tell them all: I am against the constant outrage, finger-pointing and threats. I am against to the slowly forming dictatorship of President Benigno Simeon Aquino III. Just yesterday, the Palace insists that they are not against the Supreme Court or the judiciary, and I alone is the target for impeachment. This is a big lie, because I don't believe that Renato Corona is the only one who is against the dictatorship. It's not true that Renato Corona is the only one they want to remove from the Supreme Court. I believe that we are all being opposed, including their innocent fans. Because their real goal is to destroy the judiciary, to destroy our democracy, and enforced the order of his majesty. This is the direction of the bending 'Straight Road'.

I was holding back for so long. I do not understand why our beloved president is mad at me, even since he was put in power.

Whenever we meet, I let him feel that we should interact, join and work together for the nation. We have so many problems. There's the slow growth of economy, unemployment, poverty and hunger. It seems he doesn't understand.

Just recently, he mocked us again in front of our faces. Like a true Batangueño Christian, we refrained, and we let go.

I have no fault in you, Mr. President. I have no fault towards the people.

They say, I'm the only one who's at stake here. What we are fighting here is the freedom of the Supreme Court, freedom of the judiciary, and the defense of democracy under the Constitution. I'm not willing to succumb to the extreme attempts of the other branches of government to bind the Supreme Court. I'll be the first to object. I'll be the first to fight.

Mr. President, I am the primus inter pares here in the Supreme Court. What I mean is, if it's necessary we should fight for the Supreme Court, I'll be the first.

We should not subject the Supreme Court to whatever challenges or criticisms of these opportunists. Inasmuch as fighting for the Supreme Court and Democracy, it is my honor and duty to fight this impeachment for the sake of us all. I will face this baseless accusations with all courage and talent, point per point, in the Senate. I am ready to face the trial.

My comrades, I tell you honestly, I can sleep well and my conscience is clear because I implemented all of my duties. I remained faithful to the Lord, myself, to the law, and to any person.

For now just hear my call, I invite you to join us. Right now, I offer my sincere gratitude to you in your promotions, companionship and for strengthening our will.

My dear countrymen, once I face my dangerous opponent, my only foundation is your struggles, affiliation, and stand for the Creator of our nation.

In full humility I request your understanding, but above all, I ask you all to accompany me in my fight and mission.

Once again, a beautiful and hot afternoon to all of you. May God bless us all."

Meanwhile...

The Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona's speedy impeachment gives a boost to justice in the country, according to an official of the Association of Major Religious Superiors in the Philippines (AMRSP).

Sr. Mary John Mananzan, AMRSP co-chairperson, described the proceedings as a huge help to the Aquino administration's campaign against corruption.

"Yes I welcome it at magandang development ito [and this is a good development] although na surprise din ako sa ganun kabilis [I was surprise of its swiftness]," Mananzan told Manila archdiocese-run Radyo (Radio) Veritas.

"Mukhang bumibilis na ang justice natin ngayon. Hindi kasi tayo sanay sa mabilis kaya tayo nagugulantang. Dapat i-welcome natin ang mabilis [It appears that our justice is moving fast right now. We are not use to such swiftness that's why we are shocked. We should welcome swiftness]," she added.

The House of Representatives, meeting in plenary last Monday night, voted to impeach Corona, making him the first head of the SC to be impeached.

The impeachment case was then transmitted to the Senate on Tuesday, and the chamber immediately referred it to the committee on rules being headed by Majority Leader Vicente Sotto III.

Sotto said he would file a motion on Wednesday to constitute the Senate into an impeachment court to commence on January 16.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Palace to Corona: Tell court employees to go back to work!

Philippine Chief Justice
Renato Corona
Malacañang call on Chief Justice Renato Corona to ask court employees to go back to work, after some courts cancelled hearings to express support for the embattled chief justice.

"We call on Chief Justice Corona, should he deny that a court holiday has been declared, to order them back to work and let not slow to a grinding halt the wheels of justice. We call on members of the judiciary to not let themselves be used to further the political agenda of one man and his patron," Presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said in a statement issued this noon.

"The sudden declaration of a court holiday on December 14, 2011 is yet another example of how justice can be subverted to further the interest of one," Lacierda said.

"Court hearings set for today have been cancelled—there are even reports that hearings on the Maguindanao massacre case have been reset—so that court employees can attend a hastily planned rally this afternoon in support of Chief Justice Corona. If this is true, then one must ask if the judiciary is not being manipulated into participating in one man's personal issues," he added.


Source: ABS-CBNNews.com

Monday, December 12, 2011

Chief Justice Corona impeached

Chief Justice Renato Corona
Some may rejoice over the recent news that has befallen the country of the Philippines, but it is certain that Gloria Macapagal Arroyo is not one of them.

Just recently, the House of Representatives, meeting in plenary on Monday night, voted to impeach Chief Justice Renato Corona, making him the first head of the Philippine judiciary to be impeached.

After a House caucus that started Monday afternoon, a total of 188 congressmen signed the impeachment complaint accusing Corona of betrayal of public trust and culpable violation of the Constitution.

The plenary ordered the House secretary-general to endorse the impeachment complaint to the Senate, where a trial will be held next year.

As of this posting time, the session had already been suspended after an exchange of view between members of the House majority and minority.

The articles of impeachment were then electronically transmitted to the Senate.

House Justice Committee Chairman Niel Tupas told ANC's Primetime on Monday night that the House had been working on impeaching Corona since last year.

Tupas said the draft impeachment complaint was finalized last week, and some members of the House justice committee helped him.

During the House majority caucus on Monday afternoon, Tupas said he presented the impeachment complaint against Corona for around 30 minutes. After the presentation, only 2 members of the coalition asked questions, but the overwhelming majority then asked to sign the complaint.

"We thought we'd (only) get 100, but we got 188 (signatures)," he said.

Tupas said they used 3 grounds to impeach Corona, with 8 articles.

Among the issues raised are Corona's failure to file his Statement of Assets and Liabilities and Net Worth, and the appointment of his wife to a government corporation despite it being prohibited since he was already in the Supreme Court.

Tupas said the first 3 articles in the impeachment complaint specifically center on the way Corona "voted in cases."

"These are serious, very serious allegations against the Chief Justice," he said. "We believe we have a very, very strong case against the Chief Justice."

Tupas said there were no instructions from the Palace to impeach Corona, claiming it was a purely House initiative. He denied allegations that Malacañang threatened to hold back the pork barrel of lawmakers if they refused to sign the impeachment complaint. "No such thing, no blackmail. If you believe (the complaint), then you sign."

"We believe we have a very, very strong case against the Chief Justice," he added.

However, he said they recently informed President Benigno Aquino III about their decision to impeach Corona, and "he (Aquino) said he'd support it."

Tupas described the impeachment of Corona as a move by the House to exercise its power to check on the judiciary, one of the checks and balances provided under the Constitution.

Meanwhile, former Rep. Risa Hontiveros of Akbayan said she and several citizens were supposed to be private complainants to the impeachment move, but they decided against it and "adjusted" after "it became apparent they (congressmen) could gather enough votes to transmit it (articles of impeachment) to the Senate directly."

Hontiveros said the private citizens "were content to just give our moral support."

She also denied allegations of an underhanded conspiracy against Corona. "There's no scheme (or) something operating in the shadows. Everything's out in the open."

Hontiveros said the impeachment complaint also discussed Corona's voting pattern on cases involving Arroyo. "Not only has he exhibited this voting pattern, but he alone among the justices has a close association with (Arroyo)."

She dismissed fears that Corona's impeachment will damage democracy. "He (Corona) overstates his situation as something akin to the possible destruction of democracy. For us, it's the opposite," she said.

-Courtesy of ABSCBNNews.com

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Pres. Benigno Aquino III's Speech on 1st National Criminal Justice Summit


President Benigno Aquino III's speech on 1st National Criminal Justice Summit.

For those looking on an English version of Aquino's speech and for those who wasn't able to hear what the Filipino president had spoken on 1st National Criminal Justice Summit, hear's the video and the translations.

In this video, Aquino criticized the court in front of Chief Justice Renato Corona and other justices and lawmakers during the first National Criminal Justice Summit. The Summit was hosted by the Department of Justice at the Manila Hotel on Monday.

Aquino lambasted Corona, an appointee of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, for apparently losing his impartiality regarding several decisions he made, including those concerning Arroyo.

The President first questioned the High Court's move to junk the Truth Commission, which he created to investigate all the supposed anomalies during the Arroyo administration.

Aquino also slammed the SC (Supreme Court) for issuing a temporary restraining order on the DOJ (Department of Justice) watchlist order against Arroyo, allowing her to leave the country and seek medical treatment abroad.

He also criticized the SC for questioning the constitutionality of the joint DOJ-Commission on Elections panel, which found Arroyo liable for electoral sabotage in connection with the 2007 midterm elections.

To further give an idea, here is the English translation for our honorable president's speech:
Good morning. Let's all be seated.

Oh, it's me already. I hope I'm not late. [Laughter]

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile; Speaker Sonny Belmonte; honorable members of the House of Representatives present; Chief Justice Renato Corona and the honorable members of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Sandiganbayan; excellencies of the diplomatic corps; Secretary Leila de Lima; Secretary Jesse Robredo; Secretary Eduardo de Mesa; Secretary Cesar Garcia; Chairman Francis Tolentino; Presiding Justice Villaluz of the Sandiganbayan; men and women of the Philippine National Police, led by Director General Nicanor Bartolome; civil society; nongovernment organizations; fellow workers in government; honored guests; ladies and gentlemen:

Our gathering this morning is an opportunity to further assess the strengths and weaknesses of our current criminal justice system, and to gather new and modern justice initiatives. We can say this is up to date because of the daily headlines in newspapers and televisions, which not only us, but the whole country was also able to witness the complexity of the work of the clerk of court, lawyers, and judges. No doubt the value of your work: your decisions and measures have significant implications to our democracy. Because of this, it is important that we go back on what was stated in Article 2, Section 1 of our Constitution: the sovereignty is in the people, and all government authority emanates from them. I make sure you are reminded because for once in our history, it seems we have forgotten it.

During martial law, justice wasn't focus on the welfare of the entire people, but follows the wishes of one person, the former President Ferdinand Marcos. Even my own family was a victim: my father was court martialed, however, even before the trial was started, his fate had long been decided. In a court composed of magistrates, lawyers, prosecutors, and witnesses appointed by the plaintiff himself—Mr. Marcos—the dictatorship did all they can do to twist justice and remove all the rights of my father. Although he is not guilty, he was detained and made to suffer for seven years and seven months, while those who are in power feast on the funds of the nation. They have taken the blindfold of justice, and tip the scales of justice according to their preferences.

Now, as your president, I have a sworn duty: to protect and defend the constitution, to enforce its laws, to be fair to all, and to devote myself to the service of the Nation. And part of my mandate is to make sure that the darkness that took place during the Martial law will not happen again, and if ever someone do it again, to make sure they are accounted for their transgressions.

That's why, since the beginning, we laid out the steps in order to clarify the allegations of corruption in the previous administration: from the fertilizer scam, which fattens, not the crops, but the pockets of some officers; to the ZTE deal, which also led to the kidnapping of alleged witness Jun Lozada; from allegations of fraud in 2004 and 2007 elections, and other more anomalies we wanted to unravel.

We started this from forming the Truth Commission, which should delve into the alleged corruption that were widespread during the last administration, and to try those behind it. It has no other purpose but to correct the error as soon as possible. However, we know what happened: the court claimed it was unconstitutional. We were just about to begin our first step, they barricade it immediately.

It is COMELEC's duty to ensure a clean and verified result of the election. Thus, it is natural for them to seek help from the DOJ to investigate the allegations of fraud in 2007. It is typical to form such panels, but it is being questioned by the Supreme Court. They also question the legality of the warrant of arrest imposed by the Pasay Regional Trial Court on Mrs. Arroyo.

Take note: When the Supreme Court issued the TRO, it has underlying conditions. But soon, they themselves admitted we do not need to accomplish these guidelines. Well, you even bothered to put a policy, you don't even intend to keep them. We have already followed all the procedures, but despite this, they say we are the ones looking for a fight. Who are not to doubt their true intentions?

This is not the first time the Supreme Court made a decision that's difficult to understand. According to article 7, section 15 of the Constitution, "A President should not make appointments within two months before the next presidential election up until his/her term of office, except for temporary appointments to executive positions." But we know Mrs. Arroyo still forcefully appointed the Chief Justice. He was appointed not two months before the election, but a week after the election. Based on the law and their former decision, the Supreme Court even agrees that it's illegal to assign a post two mouths before the election, unless it is a temporary position in the executive. But they turned when Mrs. Arroyo appointed, our honorable, Chief Justice Renato Corona: a position which is not covered by the executive, but of the judiciary. The question now is: did the Supreme Court violated our understanding of the Constitution?

Another example of their decision that's hard to understand is about the making of districts in Congress: In Article 6, Section 5 of the Constitution, the population must be greater than two hundred and fifty thousand for every district. The problem: there are those that did not reach this number, such as the district of Camarines Sur with over one hundred seventy six thousand population. So when we were still in the Senate, as chairman of the Committee on Local Government, we questioned the formation of this district, however, it was only thrashed by the Supreme Court. Our question now is:  if the creation of a district does not depend on the population, what will be the basis of the legislators when there is a proposal of redistricting? Meaning, we have a basis when forming a city, but if it comes to provinces or districts, there is none?

My sympathies to the new Chairman of the Senate Committee on Local Government Senator Bongbong Marcos: Goodluck on resolving this problem, I tried to resolve this during my time.

We respect the equality in power of the judiciary and the executive branch of the government. We have no intention of stomping their rights, or smear the credibility of anyone. But we need to recall the basic principles of our democracy. We, who have sworn duty are indebted to only one: you, our Boss, the people of the Philippines. We are here to serve our country; and to serve with sincerity and enthusiasm all Filipinos. Now, if there is one public servant who seeks to return the favor, not for the people who are our source of power, but to a patron that forcefully fits him into position, can we count on him to understand the interest of the people?

I am not a graduate of law. Nevertheless, we grew up with a clear vision to which is right, and which is wrong; which is humanistic, and which ones are corrupt. I stand firmly (on the belief) that justice is not a steering wheel that could easily be turned by the magistrates to where they want it to sway. It is not a toy that lawyers and judges could turn and flip according to their wishes.

Let's go back to what I said before: the power of the Supreme Court, the President, and Congress came from their only one Boss: the people [applause]. Therefore, we should side and fight for the interest of the people. I swore to protect and defend the constitution, to enforce its laws, to be fair to each person, and devote myself to serve the country. I have no intention to violate my sworn duty. I have no wish to fail the people.

It is my obligation, and it is our obligation to stay and go to the same direction, united under one goal: to serve and protect the interests of the people. To all who joined us in the right track, believe: As long as we are right, there is no fight we are going to withdraw. As long as the people are behind us, we will succeed. Let us not fail them.

Good morning, and many thanks.
Post-Reactions

Corona, despite being embarrassed in front of the people present on the summit, maintained his professionalism and even shake hands with the president. When interviewed by the media, he says that Christmas is near, we should think of peace, let it go.

However, later, the SC's spokesperson, Marquez, said that Aquino's speech is disturbing. "We went there in good faith. We were expecting coordination, cooperation," he said.

Aquino also questioned Corona's appointment, which came during the ban against midnight appointments (two nights before election).

Marquez said, however, that Corona's appointment went through constitutional process, adding, "it's just unfortunate he was appointed by someone many do not like (referring to Arroyo)."

"Corona told me issuing a statement was not necessary," he said.

The spokesperson also earlier said: "Considerably unusual... for the Chief Executive to look down on members of the judiciary in public at a Justice Sector Coordinating Council session and to their faces, denounce the court's independent actions, as the Chief Justice sat speechless, motionless and expressionless because of the requirements of protocol."

Marquez added that while the court respects the system of checks and balances, its invocation should be made in the proper setting, circumstances, and decorum.

The senators, meanwhile, believe somebody has to step in to prevent a rift between the Palace and the SC from growing any wider, but are not quite clear on who should act as peacemaker.

Senators Panfilo Lacson and Gregorio Honasan II said Congress should step in after the President criticized the SC.

The legislators said both houses of Congress should help defuse tension between their two co-equal branches of government.

"It's not up to Congress, the Senate to get mixed up in this because that will just make things worse. Congress should (instead) act as an arbiter to bring the SC and Malacañang closer together," Lacson said.

He warned that the rift could lead to local government units also ignoring court orders, as the administration is said to have done when it kept Arroyo from leaving the country despite an SC order allowing it.

Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Ejercito Estrada, meanwhile, said he would volunteer to act as mediator.

"If they want me to volunteer," he said.

He added, however, that any involvement by Congress would not be as an intrusion but only to facilitate a private dialogue between the Executive and the Judiciary.

"The rift between the Executive and the Judiciary has become too well publicized. It is not doing the country any good," he said.

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile said it would be better for the Church to step in instead.

Senator Franklin Drilon, an Aquino ally, said the SC should not be immune from criticism.