Showing posts with label documentaries. Show all posts
Showing posts with label documentaries. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

The Black Nazarene Celebration 2012

The feast of the Black Nazarene has ended, until next year. But just to give people an idea as to why this has been traditionally celebrated for over 400 years (406 years to be exact), I have written this article in the hopes of educating my fellow Filipinos, who just blindly follow the tradition. I don't want to act like an antagonist here, just simply saying that it would be better if we understand what we practice.

The Black Nazarene, known to devotees in Spanish as Nuestro Padre Jesus Nazareno (abbreviated as NPJN, or in English "Our Father Jesus Nazarene", while in Filipino, it's called "Mahal na Itim na Nazareno" or "Beloved Black Nazarene") is a life-sized, dark-colored, wooden sculpture of Jesus Christ carrying the cross, which is believed to be miraculous by many Filipino Catholics. Perhaps, but so far, only few had received an alleged blessing or miracle, and those were yet to be verified as we know hearsays are just as unreliable as gossips.

According to history, the sculpture was originally fair or light-complexioned, it turned dark after it was exposed to fire on its arrival from Mexico. The statue's original carver is an anonymous Mexican carpenter, and the image arrived in the islands via a galleon from Acapulco, Mexico.

There were actually two identical images of the Black Nazarene brought to Manila. The first and more famous one was kept at the old church of San Nicolas de Tolentino in Bagumbayan and later transferred to Intramuros when the old edifice was demolished. This Black Nazarene was part of the celebrated Palm Sunday procession in intramuros, and was destroyed in the bombing during the Battle of Manila in February 1945.

The other statue was given by the Recollect Priests to the Quiapo church, and it has been often mistaken for the image lost during the war.

To protect the centuries-old image from the wear and stress during processions, the priests of the Quiapo Basilica commissioned a replica. The head and hands of the original are now placed on the copy of the body while the old torso holds the new head and hands. Both images are used for processions, alternating every other year save for the 400th anniversary in 2007, when the original was used as a whole.

The image is venerated with the weekly Friday Novena Masses and several annual processions.

Devotion

The religious veneration of the Black Nazarene is rooted among Filipinos for the Passion of Jesus Christ. Many devotees of the Black Nazarene identify their poverty and daily struggles to the wounds and tribulations experienced by Jesus, as represented by the image.

The statue has merited the canonical sanction of Pope Pius VII who gave his Apostolic Blessing in the 19th century thereby granting plenary indulgence to those who piously pray before the statue.

Now, what is plenary indulgence? In Catholic theology, an indulgence is the full or partial remission of temporal punishment due for sins which have already been forgiven. The indulgence is granted by the Catholic Church after the sinner has confessed and received absolution. The belief is that indulgences draw on the Treasury of Merit accumulated by Christ's superabundantly meritorious sacrifice on the cross and the virtues and penances of the saints. They are granted for specific good works and prayers. Well, it may sound great but note that indulgences had been abuse in the past and a good reason why there are protestants roaming the Earth. Such indulgence which can be obtained from a mere image is strongly criticized by Christian Protestants. So, whether to believe it is a good or bad thing really depends on point of view.

Another Papal sanction came from Pope Innocent X, who approved the Confraternity of the Most Holy Jesus Nazarene (Cofradia de Nuestro Santo Jesus Nazareno) which traditionally only accepts male members.

Devotees also pay homage to the Black Nazarene by clapping their hands in praise at the end of Mass offered at the shrine.

The Processions

Two major and two minor processions are held annually to honor the Black Nazarene, namely one on the feast day itself and another on Good Friday.

The Black Nazarene is carried into the streets for procession in a shoulder-borne carriage known to devotees as the andas. The estimated number of devotees wear the color maroon, associated with the image, and go barefoot in imitation of Jesus on his way to Mount Calvary. Traditionally, only men are permitted to hold the ropes pulling the image's carriage, but in recent years, female devotees have also participated in the procession. These rope pullers are traditionally called namamasan or the carriers. There were reports of people who have been miraculously cured of their diseases for touching the Nazarene, although a formal investigation on the alleged miracles hasn't been made let alone the testimonies of the people. Catholics come from all over Manila to touch the image in the hopes of a miracle. Towels or handkerchiefs are hurled to the marshals and escorts guarding the Black Nazarene with requests to wipe these on the statue in hopes of the miraculous powers attributed to it rubbing off on the cloth articles or rather that's what Catholics believe.

The image is also brought out on two other occasions, namely New Year's Day and Good Friday, the latter being markedly more somber and silent in contrast to the loud celebration of the 9th January procession.

The Casualties

The procession held on the feast day is notorious for the annual casualties that result from the jostling and congestion of the crowds engaged in pulling the carriage. The injuries and even deaths of devotees are brought upon by one or a combination of heat, fatigue, or being trampled upon by other devotees.

On the recent celebration, more people were hurt in the 22-hour procession compared to last year, the Philippine Red Cross (PRC) said on Tuesday.

Over 1,000 people were treated compared to the 709 last year.

Twenty-two suffered serious injuries, while 569 had minor wounds.

A total of 419, meanwhile, needed a check-up.

PRC secretary-general Gwen Pang, however, said this year's injuries is still fewer by percentage given the total number of devotees who joined the procession.

She added that majority of the devotees they treated were those already near the Quiapo church.

Some also loss consciousness, some fell from the carriage, while others suffered hypertension and even stroke due to stress.

Meanwhile, despite the alleged miracle cure of the Black Nazarene which devotees claimed, doctors advise people with illness not to participate in the celebration, particularly those with high blood pressures.

Criticisms

The procession despite being an honor to the Nazarene, which is Jesus Christ - the holy icon of the Christian faith, it is still being criticized by other religions, and even by their very own Catholic clergy. Christian Protestants dislike the idea of an image being paraded, calling it an "idol", since they believe the image was merely sculpted by an ordinary man and does not represent Jesus Christ at all. Furthermore, they believe nobody has seen Jesus Christ and that he should be worship in spirit, and not in terms of statues. Other believes the practice is outrageous because Jesus Christ is not black. Meanwhile, the Catholic priests criticize the devotees lack of concern towards their fellow devotees and the environment. They also blame the devotees for not following instructions and for their stubbornness. Some devotees attempted to climb the carriage, overloading it; resulting in the destruction of a rear wheel that almost crippled the carriage. A priest said that in this year's feast, he had seen the Nazarene's burden increased. He also said that it seems the people had added more weight to the cross of the Nazarene.

Some to most people in the procession were apathetic towards their own fellow devotees. They don't care if they trample or compromise others just as long as they manage to get their hands on the Black Nazarene, thinking that in doing so, they would be bless with good health, good fortune, miracle cure, etc. which a keen observer could easily spot as a "selfish act."

The essence of Jesus Christ was lost in the ignorance of the people. And, the fact that there are casualties in the event is enough for the procession to be labeled as "dangerous" and an act of "self-endangerment." Though, it's a mystery why the Catholic Church tolerate such practice when they know it could endanger their followers.

After the feast, the garbage collected were staggering. Several garbage collection teams were sent to Manila to clean up tons of trash left by at least 2 million devotees that joined the Black Nazarene procession on Monday.

The image entered the Quiapo Minor Basilica at 6:11 a.m., after a more than 22-hour procession. Garbage collectors immediately conducted a clean-up operation to remove the trash from the streets, which consisted mostly of plastic, styrofoam cups and paper plates. The procession also left a foul smell, particularly in the vicinity of Plaza Miranda. Portalets installed in Plaza Miranda remain uncollected, which left an unpleasant smell of urine.

Barangay Chairman Joey Uy Hamisola said trash and the stench of urine are problems every year after the procession.

Manila Archbishop Luis Antonio Tagle earlier appealed to the millions of devotees not to litter the streets of Manila.

"May pakiusap at hamon po ako, sana po ang Luneta grandstand at lahat ng daraanan ng prusisyon, walang makita kahit isang basura [eng: I have a favor to ask and a challenge, I hope Luneta grandstand and all the routes of the procession, won't have even a single garbage]," Tagle said during his homily in a concelebrated mass  he officiated at the Qurino Grandstand on Monday.

"Patunayan natin na hindi na natin hihilahin si poong Nazareno at ang kalikasan pababa dahil sa ating kawalan ng pagmamalasakit. Hindi mo basurahan ang buong siyudad ng Maynila. Magpakumbaba, 'wag tayong maging mayabang [eng: Let's prove that we won't pull the almighty Nazarene and the environment down because of our lack of concern. The entire city of Manila is not your thrash can. Be humble, let's not be so proud]," he added.

Unfortunately, all those words seem nothing to the large attending crowd.

Final Word

The Philippines is a country plague by massive poverty, and it seems to have further increased. This explains why the year's feast seem to have attracted more devotees. It is in Filipino thinking that in times of darkness and suffering, they look up to their God, and being Christians, their hope lies on Jesus Christ their savior.

However, let's admit it, while other countries thrive, flourish, and advance, the Philippines is still in the Dark Ages.

Sunday, December 18, 2011

World's shortest woman

the shortest woman
Guinness World Records adjudicator Rob Molloy (right), and
Dr. Manoj Pahukar of Wockhardt hospital (2nd left), measure
Jyoti Amge at a press conference in Nagpur, India, Friday,
December 16, 2011. Amge, 18, was declared shortest woman in
the world measuring 62.8 centimeters (24.7 inches) by the
Guinness World Records.

A high school student in central India was recognized as the world's shortest woman by Guinness World Records on Friday as she turned 18 and said she hopes to earn a degree and make it in Bollywood (India's own version of Hollywood).

Jyoti Amge stood just 62.8 centimeters (24.7 inches) tall, which is shorter than the average 2-year-old, when Guinness representatives visiting from London measured her at a ceremony attended by about 30 relatives and friends in the town of Nagpur, in Maharashtra state.

A teary-eyed Amge, dressed in one of her finest saris, called the honor an "extra birthday present" and said she felt grateful for being small, as it had brought her recognition. After receiving a plaque, she and her guests cut a birthday cake.

"I have put Nagpur on the world map. Now everyone will know where it is," said Amge, who says she dreams of one day becoming a Bollywood film star as well as pursuing a university degree after she finishes high school this year.

"I want to be an actor," she said.

She measured 7 centimeters (2.76 inches) shorter than 22-year-old American Bridgette Jordan, who had held the title since September.

"Jyoti encourages us all to look beyond mere size and to just celebrate our differences," Guinness adjudicator Rob Molloy said.

This was not Amge's first Guinness record. Until Friday she was considered the world's shortest teenager, but in turning 18, she qualified for the new title. She has grown less than 1 centimeter (0.4 inch) in the last two years, Guinness said in a statement, and will grow no more due to a form of dwarfism called achondroplasia.

Her teenage title brought the chance for multiple Guinness-sponsored trips to Japan and Italy for tours and meetings with other record holders, she said.

The title of shortest woman in history continues to be held by Pauline Musters, who lived in the Netherlands from 1876 to 1895 and stood 61 centimeters (24 inches) tall.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Andres Bonifacio's Untold Story

Andres Bonifacio
It's November 30, and it's Bonifacio's Day. So as a Filipino myself, I would like to commemorate his heroism by posting a brief documentary about his life. However, since we Filipinos already studied him way back in elementary under the subject Sibika at Kultura (Civic and Culture), perhaps we already knew about him. But, did you know that he had an untold story? The story that has been kept from us because of its controversial and perhaps, demoralizing nature.

For those who don't know the Filipino hero, here's a quick information about him:

Andres Bonifacio y de Castro (30 November 1863 - 10 May 1897) was a Filipino nationalist and revolutionary. He was the founder and later Supremo ("supreme leader") of the Katipunan (Society) movement, which sought the independence of the Philippines from Spanish colonial rule, that plague early Filipinos, and started the Philippine Revolution.

He was one of those who founded the KKK or otherwise known as Kataastaasang Kagalanggalangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan ("Highest and Most Respected Society of the Children of the Country"). The secret society sought independence from Spain through armed revolt. It was influenced by Freemasonry through its rituals and organization, and several members aside from Bonifacio were also Freemasons. Among the Freemasons who influenced Bonifacio was Jose Rizal.

Rizal's liberal ideology incorporated into his two novels, Noli Me Tangere (Touch me not) and El Filibusterismo (The Filibuster) was said to had became among those things that inspired Bonifacio.

The Untold Story

There were two Katipunan provincial chapters in Cavite that became rival factions: the Magdalo, headed by Emilio Aguinaldo's cousin Baldomero Aguinaldo, and the Magdiwang, headed by Mariano Alvarez, uncle of Bonifacio's wife. Leaders of both factions came from the upper class, in contrast to Bonifacio, who came from the lower middle class. After initial successes in their revolutionary campaign, Emilio Aguinaldo issued a manifesto in the name of the Magdalo ruling council which proclaimed a provisional and revolutionary government despite the existence of the Katipunan government. Emilio Aguinaldo in particular had won fame for victories in the province. The Magdalo and Magdiwang clashed over authority and jurisdiction and did not help each other in battle. Bonifacio was called to Cavite to mediate between them and unify their efforts. In late 1896, he traveled to Cavite accompanied by his wife, his brothers Procopio and Ciriaco, and some troops.

In Cavite, tension grew between Bonifacio and the Magdalo leaders. Apolinario Mabini, who later served as Emilio Aguinaldo's adviser, writes that at this point, the Magdalo leaders "already paid little heed to his authority and orders." Bonifacio was partial to the Magdiwang, perhaps due to his kinship ties with Mariano Alvarez, or more importantly, due to their stronger recognition of his authority. When Aguinaldo and Edilberto Evangelista went to receive Bonifacio at Zapote, they were irritated with what they regarded as his attitude of superiority. In his memoirs, Aguinaldo wrote that Bonifacio acted "as if he were a king." At one instance, Bonifacio ordered the arrest of one Magdalo leader for failing to support his attack in Manila, but the other Magdalo leaders refused to surrender him. Townspeople in Noveleta (a Magdiwang town) acclaimed Bonifacio as the ruler of the Philippines, to the chagrin of the Magdalo leaders, Bonifacio replied: "long live Philippine Liberty!" Aguinaldo disputed with Bonifacio over strategic troop placements and blamed him for the capture of the town of Silang. The Spanish, through Jesuit Superior Pio Pi, wrote to Aguinaldo about the possibility of peace negotiations. When Bonifacio found it out, he and the Magdiwang council rejected the proposed peace talks. Bonifacio was also angered that the Spanish considered Aguinaldo the "chief of the rebellion" instead of him. However, Aguinaldo continued to arrange negotiations which never took place. Bonifacio believed Aguinaldo was willing to surrender the revolution.

Bonifacio was also subject to rumors that he had stolen Katipunan funds, his sister was the mistress of a priest, and he was an agent provocateur paid by friars to foment unrest. Also circulated were anonymous letters which told the people of Cavite not to idolize Bonifacio because he was a Mason, a mere Manila employee, allegedly an atheist, and uneducated. According to these letters, Bonifacio did not deserve the title of Supremo since only God was supreme. This last allegation was made despite the fact that Supremo was meant to be used in conjunction with Presidente (President), i. e. Presidente Supremo (Supreme President) to distinguish the president of the Katipunan Supreme Council from council presidents of subordinate Katipunan chapters like the Magdalo and Magdiwang. Apparently, this was a black propaganda whom Bonifacio suspected to be the work of Magdalo leader Daniel Tirona. He confronted Tirona, whose airy reply provoked Bonifacio to such anger that he drew a gun and would have shot Tirona if others had not intervened.

On December 31, Bonifacio and the Magdalo and Magdiwang leaders held a meeting in Imus, ostensibly to determine the leadership of Cavite in order to end the rivalry between the two factions. The issue of whether the Katipunan should be replaced by a revolutionary government was brought up by the Magdalo, and this eclipsed the rivalry issue. The Magdalo argued that the Katipunan, as a secret society, should have ceased to exist once the Revolution was underway. They also held that Cavite should not be divided. Bonifacio and the Magdiwang contended that the Katipunan served as their revolutionary government since it had its own constitution, laws, and provincial and municipal governments. Edilberto Evangelista presented a draft constitution for the proposed government to Bonifacio but this had earlier been rejected as too similar to the Spanish Maura Law. Upon the event of restructuring, Bonifacio was given carte blanche (Full Powers) to appoint a committee tasked with setting up a new government; he would also be in charge of this committee. He requested for the minutes of the meeting to establish this authority, but these were never provided.

The Tejeros Convention

The rebel leaders held another meeting in a friar estate house in Tejeros on March 22, 1897 on the pretense of more discussion between the Magdalo and Magdiwang, but in reality, it was meant to settle the issue of leadership of the revolution. Amidst insinuations that the Katipunan government was monarchical or dictatorial, Bonifacio maintained it was republican. According to him, all its members of whatever rank followed the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity, upon which republicanism is founded. He presided over the elections that followed, despite his misgivings over the lack of representation by other provinces. Before elections started, he asked that the results be respected by everyone, and all agreed. The Cavite leaders vote their own Emilio Aguinaldo President in absentia, as he was in the battlefield. A later iteration of Aguinaldo's government was inaugurated on June 23, 1899 as the Republica Filipina (Philippine Republic). It is considered the first Republic of the Philippines.

Bonifacio received the second-highest number of votes for President. Though it was suggested that he be automatically be awarded the Vice Presidency, no one seconded the motion and elections continued. Mariano Trias of the Magdalo, who was formerly a Magdiwang, was elected Vice President. Bonifacio was the last to be elected, as Director of the Interior. Daniel Tirona, who had helped distribute the ballots, protested Bonifacio's election to Director of the Interior on the grounds that the position should not be occupied by a person without a lawyer's diploma. Tirona suggested a prominent Cavite lawyer for the position. Hurt and angered, Bonifacio demanded an apology, since the voters had agreed to respect the election results. Instead, Tirona left the room, Bonifacio drew his gun and nearly shot Tirona again, but he was restrained by Artemio Ricarte of the Magdiwang, who had been elected Captain-General. As people left the room, Bonifacio declared: "I, as chairman of this assembly and as President of the Supreme Council of the Katipunan, as all of you do not deny, declare this assembly dissolved, and I annul all that had been approved and resolved."

The next day, Aguinaldo surreptitiously took his oath of office as President in a chapel officiated by a Catholic priest Cenon Villafranca who was under the authority of the Roman pope. According to General Santiago Alvarez, guards were posted outside with strict instructions not to let in any unwanted partisan from the Magdiwang faction while the oath-taking took place. Artemio Ricarte also took his office "with great reluctance" and made a declaration that he found the Tejeros elections "dirty or shady" and "not been in conformity with the true will of the people." Meanwhile, Bonifacio met with his remaining supporters and drew up the Acta de Tejeros (Act of Tejeros) wherein they gave their reasons for not accepting the election results. Bonifacio alleged the election was fraudulent due to cheating and accused Aguinaldo of treason due to his negotiations with the Spanish. In their memoirs, Santiago Alvarez (son of Mariano Alvarez) and Gregoria de Jesus both alleged that many ballots were already filled out before being distributed, and Guillermo Masangkay contended there were more ballots prepared than voters present. Alvarez writes that Bonifacio had been warned of the rigged ballots before the votes were canvassed, but he had done nothing.

Aguinaldo later sent a delegation to Bonifacio to get him to cooperate, but the latter refused. Bonifacio appointed Emilio Jacinto general of the rebel forces in Manila, Morong, Bulacan and Nueva Ecija. In Naik, Bonifacio met with Artemio Ricarte and others, including generals Pio del Pilar and Mariano Noriel of the Magdalo who had defected to his side. Bonifacio asserted his leadership of the revolution with the Naik Military Agreement, a document which appointed Pio del Pilar commander-in-chief of the revolutionary force. Bonifacio's meeting was interrupted by Aguinaldo himself, and del Pilar and Noriel promptly returned to Aguinaldo's fold. In late April, Aguinaldo fully assumed presidential office after consolidating his position among the Cavite elite - most of Bonifacio's Magdiwang supporters declaring allegiance to Aguinaldo. Aguinaldo's government then ordered the arrest of Bonifacio, who was then moving out of Cavite.

Capture, Trial, and Death

A party of Aguinaldo's men led by Agapito Bonzón and Jose Ignacio Paua met with Bonifacio at his camp in Indang. Unaware of the order for his arrest, Bonifacio received them cordially. The next day, Bonzón and Paua attacked Bonifacio's camp. Bonifacio did not fight back and ordered his men to hold their fire, though shots were nevertheless exchanged. In the crossfire, Bonifacio was shot in the arm, and Paua stabbed him in the neck, but was prevented from striking further by one of Bonifacio's men, who offered to be killed in his stead. Ciriaco, Bonifacio's brother was shot dead, while his other brother Procopio was beaten senseless, and his wife Gregoria may have been raped by Bonzón.

Bonifacio's party was brought to Naik, where he and Procopio stood trial on charges of sedition and treason against Aguinaldo's government and conspiracy to murder Aguinaldo. The jury was composed entirely of Aguinaldo's men and even Bonifacio's defense lawyer himself declared his client's guilt. Bonifacio was barred from confronting the state witness for the charge of conspiracy to murder on the grounds that the latter had been killed in battle, but after the trial, the witness was seen alive with the prosecutors.

The Bonifacio brothers were found guilty despite insufficient evidence and recommended to be executed. Aguinaldo commuted the sentence to deportation on May 8, 1897, but Pio del Pilar and Mariano Noriel, both former supporters of Bonifacio, persuaded him to withdraw the order for the sake of preserving unity. In this, they were seconded by Mamerto Natividad and other bona fide supporters of Aguinaldo. The Bonifacio were executed on May 10, 1897 in the mountains of Maragondon. Apolinario Mabini wrote that Bonifacio's death demoralized many rebels from Manila, Laguna, and Batangas, who had come to help those in Cavite, and caused them to quit. In other areas, some of Bonifacio's associates like Emilio Jacinto never subjected their military commands to Aguinaldo's authority.

Reactions to Trial and Execution

Historians have condemned the trial of the Bonifacio brothers as unjust. The jury was entirely composed of Aguinaldo's men; Bonifacio's defense lawyer acted more like a prosecutor as he himself declared Bonifacio's guilt and instead appealed for less punishment; and Bonifacio was not allowed to confront the state witness for the charge of conspiracy on the grounds that the latter had been killed in battle, where in reality, was still alive. Teodoro Agoncillo writes that Bonifacio's declaration of authority in opposition to Aguinaldo posed a danger to the revolution, because a split in the rebel forces would result in almost certain defeat to their united and well-armed Spanish foe.

In contrast, Renato Constantino writes that Bonifacio was neither a danger to the revolution in general for he still planned to fight the Spanish, nor to the Revolution in Cavite since he was leaving; but Bonifacio was definitely a threat to the Cavite leaders who wanted control of the Revolution, so he was eliminated. Constantino contrasts Bonifacio who had no record of compromise with the Spanish with the Cavite leaders who did compromise, resulting in the Pact of Biak-na-Bato whereas the revolution was officially halted and its leaders exiled, though many Filipinos continued to fight (though Aguinaldo, unofficially allied with the United States, did return to take charge of the revolution during the Spanish-American War).

Historians have also discussed the motives of the Cavite government to replace Bonifacio, and whether it had the right to do so. The Magdalo provincial council which helped establish a republican government led by one of their own was only one of many such councils in the pre-existing Katipunan government. Therefore, Constantino and Alejo Villanueva write Aguinaldo and his faction may be considered counter-revolutionary as well - as guilty of violating Bonifacio's constituted authority just as they considered Bonifacio to violate theirs. Aguinaldo's own adviser and official Apolinario Mabini writes that he was "primarily answerable for insubordination against the head of the Katipunan of which he was a member." Aguinaldo's authority was not immediately recognized by all rebels. If Bonifacio had escaped Cavite, he would have had the right as the Katipunan leader to prosecute Aguinaldo for treason instead of the other way around. Constantino and Villanueva also interpret the Tejeros Convention as the culmination of a movement by members of the upper class represented by Aguinaldo to wrest power from Bonifacio who represented the middle and lower classes. Regionalism among the Cavite rebels, dubbed "Cavitismo" by Constantino, has also been put forward as motivation for the replacement of Bonifacio. Mabini considered the execution as criminal and "assassination... the first victory of personal ambition over true patriotism." He also noted that "All the electors at the Tejeros Convention were friends of Don Emilio Aguinaldo and Don Mariano Trias, who were united, while Bonifacio, although he had established his integrity, was looked upon with distrust only because he was not a native of the province: this explains his resentment."

Manner of Execution

There are differing accounts of Bonifacio's manner of execution. The commanding officer of the execution party, Lazaro Macapagal, said in two separate accounts that the Bonifacio brothers were shot to death, which is the orthodox interpretation. Macapagal's second account has Bonifacio attempting to escape after his brother is shot, but he is also killed while running away. Macapagal writes that they buried the brothers in shallow graves dug with bayonets and marked by twigs.

However, another account states that after his brother was shot, Bonifacio was stabbed and hacked to death. This was allegedly done while he lay prone in a hammock in which he was carried to the site, being too weak to walk. This version was maintained by Guillermo Masangkay, who claimed to have gotten this information from one of Macapagal's men. Also, one account used to corroborate this version is of an alleged eyewitness, a farmer who claimed he saw five men hacking a man in a hammock. Historian Milagros Guerrero also says Bonifacio was bayoneted, and that the brothers were left unburied. After bones said to be Bonifacio's - including a fractured skull - were discovered in 1918, Masangkay claimed the forensic evidence supported his version of events. Writer Adrian Cristobal notes that accounts of Bonifacio's captivity and trial state he was very weak due to his wounds being left untreated; he thus doubts that Bonifacio was strong enough to make a last dash for freedom as Macapagal claimed. Historian Ambeth Ocampo, who doubts the Bonifacio bones were authentic, thus also doubts the possibility of Bonifacio's death by this manner.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Kamunyak, the Blessed One - The Lioness who adopts Oryx calves

Lioness Kamunyak with an
adopted Oryx calf.
This documentary had actually been published a long time ago, dating back as far as 2002. This documentary will serve its purpose to anybody who wish to know more about this unusual lioness.

The unique lioness was named "Kamunyak" or the "Blessed One."  She's the kind of lioness who adopts Oryx calves for some unknown reason. The news was treated with a lot of skepticism since an Oryx is a type of antelope upon which lions would normally prey. Experts were at a loss to explain the big cat's affection towards the calves. But the said lioness has been protecting her adopted young from danger and had allowed them to be nursed by their biological mothers.

Kamunyak resides in Samburu Game Reserve, Kenya.




The Heart of the Lioness

1st Adoption

The first adoption was the longest and became the first documentary of Kamunyak. The lioness had been suppressing her hunger just to guard the Oryx calf from predators. It was said that she had been guarding the Oryx 24 hrs. There was worry that the lioness may starve to death if it continues to put more time into protecting adopted oryx rather than hunting.

A Kenyan photographer famous for his big cat exploits, Jonathan Scott, says the lioness was foregoing hunting to protect the oryx and was certain to get weaker as a result.

"I have watched the lion ever since, and I have a feeling that she already needs human intervention to sustain her situation," he said. "In fact, her place in the wild is now questionable."

Scott says Kenya Wildlife Service veterinary doctor should examine the lioness in order to determine her physical health. "If her behavior does not change, she may need to be moved out of the wild for own sake," says Scott.

According to Daphne Sheldrick, who runs a world famous program rehabilitating orphaned wildlife in Nairobi, the relationship is strange, "These creatures are simply not compatible, and the situation should be allowed to play itself out until the lioness learns to stop adopting oryx," she said.

The lioness first made headlines in early January, when, to the surprise of Kenya's wildlife experts, she adopted her first oryx calf. For 17 days, she starved while the baby antelope made regular visits to its lactating mother.

At one point, the lioness scared off a family of cheetahs that tried to kill the calf. Unfortunately, the union was short lived and the 1st calf's life was snubbed out by a hungry male King Lion while Kamunyak had gone to drink water from a river. The African Lion is known for being overly aggressive of cubs/calves sired by other males, let alone one from an Oryx.

Kamunyak was devastated, but this did not stop her from adopting another Oryx.

2nd Adoption

On the second adoption, the second adoptee has been taken away from the lioness by wildlife officials.

"It was either that or leave it to die. It was too weak and would not have survived another day without being fed," said senior Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) warden, Julius Kimani, who led the operations. "We will try and return it to its mother but we fear she might reject it," said Kimani.

Although it is not clear how the second calf and its true mother were separated, wildlife wardens this time mounted a 24 hour guard to make sure no predators took the calf away from its adopted lion mother. "The wardens were kept busy throughout the night, and at one time, they had to scare away a pride of lions that were prowling too close to the sleeping duo," said Kimani.

Game wardens tranquilized the frail Beisa oryx calf as it dozed under an acacia tree when the lioness went to hunt. The calf, dubbed Valentine, was taken first to Lewa Downs, a private game sanctuary near Nanyuki on the slopes of Mount Kenya. Later on, the oryx calf was flown by private plane to Nairobi and driven to the Animal Orphanage at the Nairobi National Park.

However, that has not deterred the lioness. After the second calf was taken away, she began following a herd of oryx at the 104 square kilometer Samburu Game Reserve, some 343 kilometers (213 miles) northeast of Nairobi.

"We do not know why it has adopted a strange liking for baby oryx. We would like researchers to tell us. Right now, it is following a new herd," says Kimani.

Before the second calf was taken away, a local tourist hotel manager, Kioko Musyoki said he saw the lioness carry the calf away and also put the calf's head inside its mouth. "The baby just stands there, flapping its ears, while the lioness stands guard over it. It hadn't moved more than five meters from it all day," observed Musyoki.

3rd Adoption

The 3rd adopted oryx was named "Easter," because she adopted it over the Easter weekend.

Her third, managed to stay in good health. Kamunyak repeatedly allowed the calf to return to its natural mother and feed, before taking the calf back into her care.

During the period of this most recent adoption, visitors to the reserve had plenty of opportunities to watch this most unusual natural drama unfold. At one stage, Kamunyak fought and held off a pride of 8 lions who were stalking her adopted offspring.

The relationship ended, however, when she again allowed the calf to return to its mother. The entire herd fled, taking the calf with it. Kamunyak tried to chase them and recover her calf, but failed.

4th Adoption

The fourth adoption was same as with the third. The mother of the oryx was able to rescue the oryx at a later stage.

After Kamunyak's last adoption ended with the calf returning to the herd, it seemed that she lost interest in becoming a surrogate mother, and she stopped following the herds.

5th Adoption

On Monday 7/10/02, Rangers were surprised to find her with her fifth adoptive "cub," a tottering 5 day old Oryx calf, and the story has once again made headlines.

Tourists and journalists were tracking down the unlikely duo, and experts are ascertaining whether she is again allowing the calf to return to its herd to feed.

Kamunyak herself is clearly undisturbed by all of this attention, and is busy playing the role of devoted- if unconventional- parent.

However, the fifth adoption also ended in a failure. The oryx starved to death, and when it was dead, it was eaten up by the lioness (lioness do this when their young ones die).

6th Adoption

The sixth calf manage to escape the lioness and return to its mother. It was reported that there was a battle between Kamunyak and the mother Oryx.

Theories

Wildlife experts have offered a range pf scientific explanations, with most attributing the adoption to unfulfilled maternal instincts.

Belinda Otieno, a wildlife researcher, says that the lioness "may be unable to conceive her own cub, and has taken to satisfying her natural instincts through another species."

But there is still no explanation on why she is so fond of the oryx, nor why she turned to a prey species instead of adopting a lion cub.

Ditte Dahl Lisbjerg, an animal behavior scientist who works with the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in Nairobi says, "Scientists need more information on the history of the lioness to understand its behavior."

Kamunyak had been seen hunting warthogs and other small prey. During the first adoption when she remained with the Oryx for 16 days, she kept a 24 hour vigil over the Oryx. Despite being very thin and hungry, when she caught sight of prey, she refused to let the Oryx out of her sight.

In February 2003, she was seen in a big fight with two females who are thought to come from the same territory. She was skulking around the edge of a giraffe carcass that the pride of 7 lions had been feeding on. There are several theories that have been proposed to explain this extraordinary behavior of the female African lion.

The question has been raised whether this could have begun on a hunt with an unusually long game of cat and mouse, where after 24 hours she bonded with the calf. Sub-adults have been known to play with mongooses and other small species over a short period of time. However, three weeks suggests that the cat and mouse game turned into something else. But now on her 6th adoption, it seems that the lioness actively goes in search of Oryx calves to kidnap.

The Samburu people suggested Kamunyak is barren. However, this seems unlikely considering that her body is responding to an overactive maternal drive. Plus she was so young and it is very difficult to tell whether a female is barren.

She could have a serious hormonal imbalance, which is triggering this abnormal behavior with another species. There have been records of lioness with huge cysts on their ovaries that affect their behavior, but perhaps not to this degree.

According to a scientist who has studied elephant reproduction, phantom pregnancies are quite common in feline species. It could be compared to domestic dogs that have phantom pregnancies and start lactating. If a lioness' rank affects their endocrinology, perhaps a phantom pregnancy is a possible explanation.

Kamunyak only adopted Oryx calved. Like all cats, lions have acute vision primed especially to pick up on movement. But they do not seem to be very good at individual recognition from a distance, and rely primarily on their sense of smell at close quarters to identify one another. Oryx calves are remarkably similar in color to the tawny coat of an African lion, and it is possible that once the lioness had locked onto the smell of "cub" in the calf then it's lack of a feline physique ceased to matter.

The park rangers suggested that she found the calf shortly after it was born and the smell of the amniotic sack on the calf's body triggered some kind of maternal response.

The fact is that we will never really be sure by in the middle of the Kenyan game reserve, a young female African Lion decided to start adopting Oryx calves. And not just one, but six different calves at different days and for increasingly longer duration. Sometimes even to her expense as she could not effectively hunt so as to keep guard; a fact that emaciated her to a point of near death.

Kamunyak's Adoption History

Dec - Jan 2002 1st Adoption: lasted for 16 days – calf was eaten by a male lion prowling near the river where the two drank.

Feb 14, 2002  2nd Adoption: Calf was named "Valentine," it lasted for 2-3 days – calf was rescued by Kenyan Wildlife Service (KWS).

Apr 2002 3rd Adoption: Calf was named "Easter," it lasted for 2 days – calf was rescued by its biological mother, and this incident had left the lioness injured.

May 2002 4th Adoption: lasted only for 24 hrs – calf was abandoned by Kamunyak and was rescued by its biological mother at a later stage.

Sept 2002 5th Adoption: lasted for 2 days – calf starved to death, and when dead, it was eaten by the lioness (lions sometimes eat their own cubs when they die).

Jan 2003 6th Adoption: lasted only for 24 hrs. – calf escaped and returned to its mother, shortly after Kamunyak and the mother Oryx fought.

Kamunyak: "The Blessed One"

Her story was recorded by Saba Douglas-Hamilton and her sister, Dudu, between January 2002 - August 2003. Their film, Heart of a Lioness, was first shown on the BBC and later premiered in the United States on Animal Planet in March 2005. Video clips from this film can be accessed on the Discovery Channel website, together with audio interviews with pictures and an extensive discussion.

It is thought that Kamunyak may be around 11 years old now. She was estimated to be about 2 to 3 years old when she adopted her first Oryx calf.

Kamunyak was most often alone. She seemed to move in the same territory as with the pride of 7 lions, which is in the heart of Samburu National Reserve, and is possibly one of the better feeding grounds for Samburu African lions. When she adopted Oryx calves, she moved in a very small area and when she was alone, she sometimes disappeared for months. She has not been seen since February 2004. If she shares the same territory as the pride of 7 African Lions, she could possibly have had a history with the pride in whose territory she resided.

It is believed that in the past, Kamunyak had a sister. However, her solitary life could be a result of being kicked out of a pride. Perhaps her pride became too large and sub-groups split off to form new lion prides. Perhaps she was cast out as a single lioness and had to fend for herself, in between warring territorial prides, as a vagrant nomadic female, eking out an existence on the periphery.

Kamunyak was last sighted in February 2004, then she eventually disappeared, and despite a number of searches, has not been seen since.

Additional Photos





Friday, November 25, 2011

Pocahontas Documentary

Pocahontas and her son, Thomas Rolfe
There are so many stories surrounding the Indian princess "Pocahontas," some have even romanticized it to fit the idea of a lovely fairytale, but little knows the real story behind. And as always, the real world isn't as nice as the imaginary one.

Pocahontas was the daughter of Powhatan, a paramount chief of an alliance of Virginia Indians in Tidewater Virginia, ancient America. An iconic figure in American history, Pocahontas is largely known for saving the life of the Jamestown colonist John Smith and then romancing him — although both events are unlikely to be true. She did meet Smith several times, sometimes serving as Powhatan's silent figurehead and a symbolic liaison between the chief and the English colonists; she wasn't, however, a "princess" or a diplomat in any modern sense. Sometime around 1610, she married an Indian named Kocoum, and in 1613, she was captured by the English and confined at Jamestown, where she converted to Christianity and married the colonist John Rolfe. The marriage was approved by Powhatan, and it brought an end to the First Anglo-Powhatan War (1609-1614) and set the stage for Pocahontas' visit to London in 1616. At the request of  the Virginia Company of London, she met both King James I and the bishop of London, after which she reunited briefly with Smith. Early in her return voyage to Virginia, she mysteriously became ill and died at Gravesend in March 1617. In the following centuries since, Pocahontas' life has slipped into myth, serving to represent Virginia's early claim to be the foundation-place of America. Meanwhile, many elite Virginians have tenuously claimed her as a relative, even leading to a "Pocahontas clause" in the Racial Integrity Act of 1924.

19th century oil portrait of Pocahontas by artist
Robert Matthew Sully, depicting the legendary
Virginian Indian before her conversion to
Christianity and her marriage to the English
colonist John Rolfe. Despite the artist's attempt
to portray Pocahontas more in accordance with
Indian character, Sully endows her with features
conforming to Anglo-Saxon standards of beauty.
In her mode of dress, the artist claimed to have
been inspired by descriptions of Indians in The
History and Present State of Virginia (1705), by
colonist Robert Beverley. Pocahontas is shown
here wearing flowers in her hair and a fur robe
that leaves her nude to a little below the
shoulders.
Early Life

Pocahontas was one of dozens of children born to Powhatan, the paramount chief of Tsenacomoco, a political alliance of Algonquian-speaking Indians in Tidewater Virginia. Her mother's name and tribal origin, as well as her birth date, were never recorded, although no English colonist ever suggested that she was not an Indian.

In her infancy, Pocahontas was given the secret personal name Matoaka. Later, she was known as Amonute. Neither name can be translated.

Pocahontas' birth year is unknown, but some historians estimate it to have been around 1595, based on the accounts of Captain John Smith. In Smith's A True Relation of Virginia (1608), Smith described the Pocahontas he met in the spring of 1608 as being "a child of ten-years-old. In a letter written in 1616, he again described her as she was in 1608, but this time, she had grown slightly to "a child of twelve or thirteen years of age."

Powhatan had many wives, and according to their Indian custom, he can keep a wife only until she had a child by him, after which he would sent her back to her people and be supported by him until she found another husband. As a result, Pocahontas had no full siblings and many half siblings. When each child was ready to leave home and become part of a working household — probably at the age of eight to ten years — he or she moved to Powhatan's capital, freeing the mother to remarry.

Late in her childhood, Pocahontas likely joined Powhatan's large, busy household, where everybody worked, even Powhatan himself. In addition to their daily tasks, members of the household labored to produce grand feasts on important occasions. Meanwhile, Pocahontas probably participated in what was traditionally women's work, which includes farming, collecting wild foods and firewood, making utensils, cooking, and cleaning, and as a result, she had little contact with her father or other males during the day. In the evenings, she probably had stiff competition for her father's attention. Still, by 1607, she was her father's favorite child. Her new name, "Pocahontas," may suggest why. William Strachey, who lived at Jamestown from 1610 until 1611, translated "Pocahontas" as "little wanton." In Strachey's time, "wanton" meant not only bawdy but also cruel and undisciplined. In other words, it's possible that Pocahontas may have teased Powhatan about his age (about 60-years-old), and his multitude of wives, and he may have been delighted by it.

John Smith

Chromolithograph credited to the New England
Chromo. Lith. Company, ca. 1870, shows Pocahontas
saving the life of John Smith. The scene is idealized and
relies on stereotypes of American Indians rather than
reliable information about the particulars of this
historical moment. For example, there are no mountains
in Tidewater Virginia, and Powhatan Indians lived not
in tipis but in thatched houses. And the scene that
Smith famously described in his Generall Historie
(1624) did not take place outdoors but in a longhouse.
Pocahontas' first opportunity to see an Englishman came late in December 1607, about eight months after the founding of Jamestown, when John Smith was brought to Powhatan's capital at Werowocomoco. Smith had initially been a captive, but after being vetted by the high priests, he arrived as an honored guest. In The Generall Historie of Virginia, New-England, and the Summer (1624), he famously wrote that he was threatened to death only to be rescued by Pocahontas, a story that subsequently became legend. However, in a more reliable account — a letter written a few months after his visit — Smith said only that he was feasted and then interviewed by Powhatan. This version of event makes sense, given how eager the Indian leadership was to find out why the English had come and stayed in Virginia. The interview took place inside Powhatan's house, a space large enough to accommodate only a few dozen people at most. In fact, Pocahontas probably wasn't even there; being then a young girl of perhaps eleven, she was needed to help with food preparation and washing up afterward.

English colonist Captain John Smith, arrived in Virginia with just more than a hundred other settlers in April 1607. After building a fort on a marshy peninsula poking out into the James River, the Englishmen had numerous encounters over the next several months with the American Indians of Tsenacommacah, some of them friendly, while some are hostile. Then, in December 1607, while exploring on the Chickahominy River, Smith was captured by a hunting party led by Powhatan's younger brother (or perhaps, a close relative) Opechancanough and this is how he was brought into Powhatan's capital.

The anthropologist Helen C. Rountree has argued that Smith's first version of events (the event in which he was interviewed by Powhatan was more reliable than the second. Smith may have exaggerated or invented the account to enhance Pocahontas' standing. On the other hand, he may have been telling the truth. Some scholars have argued that the absence of the episode in Smith's earlier works should not be definitive evidence that it did not happen. Historian J. A. Leo Lemay, for instance, noted in his 1992 book that, as Smith's earlier was primarily concerned with geographical and ethnographic matters, he had no reason then to recount the story of Pocahontas. Stan Birchfield has written that "Smith's writings are perfectly consistent with the truthfulness of the episode," but he does not take into account the strong implication, in Smith's True Relation, that he did not first meet Pocahontas until the spring of 1608.

John Smith
In True Travels (1630), Smith told a similar story of having been rescued by the intervention of a young girl after having been captured in 1602 by Turks in Hungary. The historian Karen Ordahl Kupperman has suggested that he "presented those remembered events from decades earlier" when telling the story of Pocahontas. In other words, his story may have grown taller over time. A different theory suggests that Smith may have misunderstood what had happened to him in Powhatan's longhouse. Rather than the near victim of an execution, he may have been subject to a tribal ritual intended to symbolize his death and rebirth as a member of the tribe. However, this theory is unlikely being as that little is known of Powhatan rituals, nor is there evidence of similar rituals among other North American Indian groups. The historian Margaret Williamson Huber has argued that Powhatan, in this case, was being politically pragmatic by attempting to bring Smith, and so the English, into his chiefdom. According to Huber, Powhatan attempted to offer Smith rule of the town of Capahosic, which was close to Powhatan's capital at Werowocomoco. In this way, the paramount chief hoped to keep Smith and his men "nearby and better under control."

Early historical accounts did establish that Pocahontas befriended Smith and the Jamestown colony. Pocahontas often went to the settlement and played games with the boys there. When the colonists were starving, "every once in four or five days, Pocahontas with her attendants brought him (Smith) so much provision that saved many of their lives that else for all this had starved with hunger." As the colonists expanded their settlement further, the Virginia Indians felt their lands were threatened, and conflicts arose again.

In another historical account, Pocahontas traveled to Jamestown in the spring of 1608 as part of a delegation charged with negotiating the release of several Indian captives. Sent as a silent reminder of Powhatan's trust in Smith, she was accompanied by several fully armed adult men, one of whom, Rawhunt, who did all the talking. The captives were released — although to Pocahontas rather than Rawhunt, presumably because she served as a symbol of Powhatan. In his 1624 account, Smith hints that Pocahontas, acting as a diplomat, led the party, but earlier eyewitness accounts say no such thing. Even the daughter of a powerful chief like Powhatan would have left military and diplomatic matters to her male relatives. This was especially true for Pocahontas, who had not only uncles but also two older half brothers, serving Powhatan as appointed district chiefs.

With his later accounts suggesting that Pocahontas saved him personally as well as (in some accounts) the entire Jamestown colony, Smith had a tendency to attribute to Powhatan's daughter power she was unlikely to have possessed. That tradition continues in the frequent modern day references to her as a "princess." Pocahontas lived in a society in which the paramount chief's position was matrilineal. In other words, Powhatan's brothers, sisters, and his sisters' children were his heirs, not his own children. As such, Pocahontas was not a princess in the European sense, and next to her favored half brothers, she was relatively powerless, either to gain entry to that first feast with John Smith or later to act on behalf of the English. On most occasions when she visited Jamestown, she probably tagged along with adults, as did other young people eager to gawk at the foreigners. Smith later described Pocahontas' "wild train," or mischievous retinue, while Strachey described her goading the English boys into turning cartwheels with her around the fort.

From the autumn of 1608 onward, relations between the Jamestown colony and Powhatan became more strained, culminating in the First Anglo-Powhatan War. Powhatan moved his capital west to Orapax, on the Chickahominy River, and out of the reach of English ships. Smith departed Virginia in October 1609 after getting injured from a gunpowder explosion. He return to England for medical care. The story of Pocahontas traveling to Jamestown to ask after him is unlikely to be true. Otherwise she would have been in danger of being taken as a hostage. Instead, she probably learned about Smith's departure through her father's intelligence channels.

It was also said that the English told the American Indians that Smith was dead. Pocahontas believed that account until she learned that he was living in England when she traveled there several years later, already the wife of John Rolfe.

Historical records do not suggest that Smith and Pocahontas were lovers. The romance is featured only in fictional versions of their relationship.

Marriage, Capture, and Remarriage

In this engraving, The abduction of Pocahontas (1619) by
Johann Theodor de Bry, depicts a full narrative. Starting in
the lower left, Pocahontas (center) is deceived by the
weroance Iopassus, who holds as bait a copper kettle, and
his wife, who pretends to cry. At center right, Pocahontas is
put on the boat and feasted. In the background, the action
moves from the Potomac to the York River, where negotiations
for a hostage trade fail and the English attack and burn an
American Indian village.
What little is known about Pocahontas' next few years comes from William Strachey, whose interpreter, Machumps, was one of Powhatan's brothers-in-law. Through Machumps, Strachey learned that Pocahontas began menstruating sometime in 1610, soon after which she married an Indian named Kocoum, who is described by Strachey as a "private captain," or a warrior who was a commoner. There is no record of any children or of where the couple lived after the wedding. Nothing more is known about this marriage. It likely ended, according to American Indian custom, when Pocahontas was captured by the English in 1613.

The English began to expand their settlements beyond the Jamestown fort, including at Henricus, established on the James River in September 1611. It was slowed but not stopped by Indian guerrilla attacks. The English by 1613 were sending ships to trade with the Potomac River tribes who were beginning to act beyond the control of Tsenacomoco. In April 1613, Captain Samuel Argall heard that Pocahontas was visiting Passapatanzy, a satellite town of the Patawomecks, one of his trading partners. Argall pressured the subchief, Iopassus (Japazaws), to assist him in taking her prisoner, promising an alliance against Powhatan. After conferring with his superior, Iopassus agreed, and with his wives' help, lured Pocahontas aboard Argall's ship. Argall promptly transported her to Jamestown and sent a ransom demand to her father.

Pocahontas' capture occurred in the context of the First Anglo-Powhatan War, a conflict between the Jamestown settlers and the American Indians that began late in the summer of 1609. The ransom includes the release of English prisoners held by her father, along with various stolen weapons and tools.

Powhatan returned the prisoners, but failed to satisfy the colonists with the number of weapons and tools he returned. A long standoff ensued, during which the English kept Pocahontas captive.

During the year-long wait, she was held at Henricus, in modern-day Chesterfield County, Virginia. Little is known about her life there, although colonist Ralph Hamor wrote that she received "extraordinary courteous usage." Linwood "Little Bear" Custalow, in a 2007 book, asserted that Pocahontas was raped during this time, citing oral tradition handed down over four centuries. Custalow cited the Mattaponi oral history which attributes to Mattachanna, whom the English sent for in order to comfort Pocahontas when she became depressed while being held captive. "When Mattachanna arrived at Jamestown, Pocahontas confided in Mattachanna that she had been raped," the authors write. "It is possible that it had been done to her by more than one person and repeatedly." Although Pocahontas soon would be married to planter John Rolfe, the oral history suggests that the colonist Sir Thomas Dale, and not Rolfe, may have been the father of Pocahontas' child, Thomas Rolfe, who, the book claims, was born prior to the wedding. According to Helen Rountree, "Other historians have disputed that such oral tradition survived and instead argue that any mistreatment of Pocahontas would have gone against the interests of the English in their negotiations with Powhatan." Moreover, a truce had been called, the Indians still far outnumbered the English, and the colonists feared retaliation.

The Baptism of Pocahontas (1840).
This twelve-by-eighteen-foot oil painting was painted by
Virginia born artist John Gadsby Chapman.
In any event, Deputy Governor Sir Thomas Dale, with the help of Alexander Whitaker, the minister at Jamestown and Henricus, saw to it that she was trained in the ways of the Anglican Church and was taught English. She was baptized and given the Christian name Rebecca, at which time, she also revealed her secret name, Matoaka. By the time the English forced the issue of ransom payment in March 1614, she and John Rolfe apparently had fallen in love. A 28-years-old widower from a family in the English gentry, Rolfe had come to Virginia, with Dale and Strachey. In 1610, and over a dozen years, he made his fortune in tobacco.

In March 1614, the standoff built up to a violent confrontation between hundreds of English and Powhatan men on the Pamunkey River. At Powhatan's capital of Matchcot, the English encountered a group of some senior American Indian leaders (excluding Powhatan himself, who was away). The English permitted Pocahontas to talk to her countrymen. Pocahontas reportedly rebuked her father for valuing her "less than old swords, pieces, or axes," and told the Powhatan she preferred to live with the English.

John Rolfe was a very pious man who agonized over the potential moral repercussions of marrying a heathen. In a long letter to the governor requesting permission to wed her, he expressed both his love for her and his belief he would be saving her soul claiming he was:
"...motivated not by the unbridled desire of carnal affection, but for the good of this plantation, for honor of our country, for the Glory of God, for my own salvation... namely Pocahontas, to whom my hearty and best thoughts are, and have been a long time so entangled, and enthralled in so intricate a labyrinth that I was even a-wearied to unwind myself thereout."
Pocahontas' feelings about Rolfe and the marriage are unknown. Although it can be assumed that there was love involve.

Dale assented to their marriage — as did Powhatan, who sent one of Pocahontas' uncles as a witness — and on or about April 5, 1614, Rolfe and Pocahontas were married, and the minister Richard Bucke performed it. For two years, they lived on Rolfe's plantation, Varina Farms, which was located across the James River from the new community of Henricus. They had a child, Thomas Rolfe, born on January 30, 1615.

Meanwhile, Powhatan called a halt to his ongoing war with the English. It is unlikely that Pocahontas negotiated the peace, as some writers have claimed, nor would she have been needed as an interpreter by then. Instead, she served as a figurehead — a symbol of peaceful relations and a Christianized "savage."

Ralph Hamor wrote:
"Since the wedding, we have had friendly commerce and trade not only with Powhatan but also with his subjects round about us."
In 1616, the Virginia Company of London paid her passage to England.

A 19th century depiction of
Pocahontas.
Life in England

The Virginia Company of London had long seen one of its primary goals as the conversion of American Indians to Christianity. With the conversion of Pocahontas and her marriage to an Englishman, all of which helped bring an end to the First Anglo-Powhatan War, the company saw an opportunity to promote investment. The company decided to bring Pocahontas to England as a symbol of the tamed New World "savage" and the success of the Jamestown settlement. In 1616, the Rolfes traveled to England, arriving at the port of Plymouth on June 12. They journeyed to London by coach, accompanied by a group of about eleven other Powhatans, including a holy man named Uttamatomakkin, also Tomocomo for short. Tomocomo is Powhatan's brother-in-law who was sent along with Pocahontas to act as an observer. In particular, Tomocomo was tasked with finding John Smith, meeting the English king, viewing the English god, and conducting a census of both the Englishmen and their trees (an earlier Indian visitor, who saw only London and the Thames River, had mistakenly reported that there were next to no trees in England, explaining why the English sought timber in Virginia). Tomocomo would accomplish the first two objectives but fail with the rest, and his encounters with evangelistic clergymen such as Reverend Samuel Purchas would turn his sympathies against the English forever.

John Smith was living in London at the time and while Pocahontas was in Plymouth, she learned he was still alive. Smith did not meet Pocahontas, but wrote to Queen Anne, the wife of King James, urging that Pocahontas be treated with respect as a royal visitor. He suggested that if she were treated badly, her "present love to us and Christianity might turn to ... scorn and fury," and England might lose the chance to "rightly have a Kingdom by her means."

Pocahontas was entertained at various society gatherings. On January 5, 1617, she and Tomocomo were brought before the king at the Banqueting House in Whitehall Palace at a performance of Ben Jonson's masque, The Vision of Delight. According to Smith, King James was so unprepossessing that neither Pocahontas nor Tomocomo realized whom they had met until it was explained to them afterward.

Although Pocahontas was not a princess in the context of Powhatan culture, the Virginia Company nevertheless presented her as a princess to the English public. The inscription on a 1616 engraving of Pocahontas, made for the company, reads: "MATOAKA ALS REBECCA FILIA POTENTISS : PRINC : POWHATANI IMP:VIRGINIÆ," which means: "Matoaka, alias Rebecca, daughter of the most powerful prince of the Powhatan Empire of Virginia." Many English at this time recognized Powhatan to be the ruler of an empire, and they presumably accorded to his daughter what they considered appropriate status. Smith's letter to Queen Anne refers to "Powhatan their chief King." Samuel Purchas recalled meeting Pocahontas in London, writing that she impressed those she met because she "carried her self as the daughter of a king." When he met her again in London, Smith referred to Pocahontas deferentially as a "King's daughter."

Pocahontas was apparently treated well in London. At the masque, her seats were described as "well placed," meaning seated among important people, and according to Purchas, John King, Bishop of London, "entertained her with festival state and pomp beyond what I have seen in his great hospitality afforded to other ladies."

Not all the English were so impressed though. According to Helen C. Rountree, "there is no contemporary evidence to suggest ... that Pocahontas was regarded in England as anything like royalty." Rather, she was considered to be something of a curiosity and according to one observer, she was merely "the Virginian woman," refusing to acknowledge her as a lady.

According to Robert Beverley Jr., King James was angry with John Rolfe for presuming to marry a "princess," there is no contemporary evidence to suggest that the king was angered by the marriage and that Pocahontas was regarded as anything like royalty.

Even John Smith took little trouble to pay his respects to his former friend. Living in London himself, he waited several months before calling on her. In his 1624 account, he claimed that he had been too busy, and when he finally made his appearance, Pocahontas was so angry with him that she retired to another room to regain her composure. Their conversation, once it began, soon degenerated into her flinging taunts at him about his shabby treatment of her father. Smith ended his account of the visit with her telling him that she and her fellow American Indians had thought him dead, but her father had told Tomocomo to seek him "because your countrymen will lie much (often)."

If Smith was an accurate reporter — he wrote about the conversation seven years after it happened — then Pocahontas may have been experiencing some disillusionment with her husband's people. By the time Smith came around, she and her family had moved to Brentford, which was then a small village outside London. Later writers have claimed that her health was failing in the capital's smoky environs, although this is unlikely, given the fact that Pocahontas had grown up in smoky Indian housed. It is more probable that her novelty among the upper classes had faded, and without rich sponsors, the Virginia Company was forced to transfer her to cheaper accommodations. Indirect evidence also suggests that she was in good health at that time.

Though they were already planning to return to Virginia, a week before they departed, the Rolfes were awarded a large grant by the Virginia Company to start a mission. As part of such an enterprise, Pocahontas would have been expected to serve the dual roles of interpreter and housemother, which would have been a strenuous assignment.

Death

After a two-month delay because of bad weather, the Rolfes and Tomocomo embarked for Virginia in March 1617. Pocahontas was rumored to have regrets about leaving London, but that may have been wishful thinking on the part of some Englishmen. In the end though, she became gravely ill.

The ship had only gone as far as Gravesend on the River Thames when Pocahontas became ill. She was taken ashore and died in John Rolfe's arms at the age of twenty-two (21 on another account). It is unknown what exactly caused her death, but theories range from smallpox, pneumonia, or tuberculosis, to her having been poisoned (Custalow's account). In Custalow's account based on Mattaponi oral history, Mattachanna, who was among the 16 Powhatan people who accompanied Pocahontas on her voyage to England, claims that a healthy Pocahontas became suddenly ill after a shipboard meal. She died within hours. Mattachanna believed that she was poisoned. Based on her testimony, it was believed that Pocahontas, having learned in England about the extent of the plans to colonize her homeland, became emboldened and thus dangerous. They feared that if they allowed Pocahontas to return, she would lead the Powhatan to revolt against them, however such account had been found questionable by some historians.

According to Rolfe, she died sating, "all must die, but it's enough that her child lives." Her funeral took place on March 21, 1617 in the parish of Saint George's Gravesend. The site of her grave is unknown, but her memory is honored in Gravesend with a life-size bronze statue at St. George's Church.

Her son, Thomas, was too sick himself to travel, and therefore remained in England. Although later on, he finally sailed for Virginia in 1635, but it was thirteen years after his father's death. Tomocomo, meanwhile, returned to Virginia with John Rolfe and Samuel Argall and reported to Powhatan's brother, Opechancanough, in such negative terms about his experience that the English attempted to discredit him. The ships that carried Argall, Rolfe, and Tomocomo back to Virginia also brought to the colony an epidemic of hemorrhagic dysentery, which colonists called bloody flux and which Argall referred to as "a great mortality;" this epidemic may have been the cause of Pocahontas' death.

Legacy

Statue of Pocahontas in
St. George's church, Gravesend,
Kent, England
Pocahontas is one of the iconic figures in American history. Since her death, her life story has been supplanted by myth. Except for her time in London, her contemporaries paid little attention to her, and they wrote next to nothing about her. In fact, she did not become a celebrity until the 1820s, when southerners sought a colonial heroine to compete with the story of the Pilgrims in Massachusetts and so establish Virginia (more accurately) as the earlier of the two English colonies. Toward that end, historians consulted Smith's Generall Historie, which two hundred years later was still one of the only available published accounts of early Jamestown. Written in the midst of the Second Anglo-Powhatan War (1622-1632), Smith's book emphasizes treacherous natives, a heroic Smith, and the one "good" Indian, "Princess Pocahontas." Some of what Smith writes include the famous episode in which Pocahontas saved his life, which contradicts his earlier accounts. Nevertheless, the mythical Pocahontas survives in the Walt Disney animated feature Pocahontas (1995), and the Terrence Malick film, The New World (2005), both of which emphasize an unlikely romance between the young girl and Smith.

Because of her celebrity, Virginians have long sought to connect themselves with Pocahontas. After St. George's Church burned in 1727, her bones and those of all the other people buried under the church floor were reinterred in a mass grave in the churchyard. Attempts made in the 1920s to identify her bones were unsuccessful. However, many Virginians have claimed descent from Pocahontas. The Racial Integrity Act, passed by the General Assembly in 1924, allowed the state to assign all newborns to racial categories and disallowed the mixing of those categories, especially in marriage. But one exception was made: "persons who have 1/16 or less of the blood of the American Indian and have no other non-Caucasic blood shall be deemed to be white persons."

Referred to as the "Pocahontas clause," this language was added in direct response to an outcry by elite Virginians who claimed Pocahontas and John Rolfe as distant relatives and who worried that, according to the proposed law, they were not considered to be white.

Such connections, though, have always been tenuous at best.

Pocahontas' son, Thomas Rolfe, never joined the Virginia colony's elite upon his return in 1635. He died in 1681 (although some accounts say it was 1875). Virginia kept no consistent records of births, marriages, and deaths before 1853, and no part of a Thomas Rolfe-descended genealogy was written down until the 1820s. In other words, exactly when the Pocahontas myth was beginning to be constructed. Who is and is not actually descended from Pocahontas thus remains both cloudy and controversial.